Last batch of "Images La Sauvette"

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Last batch of "Images La Sauvette"

Postby rokkstar on Mon Aug 08, 2005 4:12 pm

Ok, I can imagine this is getting quite boring for everyone now so this will be the last post of "Matts B&W street shots" I promise.

Would appreciate critique on these puppies:

Image
Image
Image

Cheers
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby embi on Mon Aug 08, 2005 5:25 pm

I like them a lot....number 3 is very interesting.
Last edited by embi on Mon Aug 08, 2005 6:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"If your pictures aren't good enough, you're probably not close enough." Robert Capa.

D70 - Nikon 18-70 (Kit Lens), 50mm f1.4, 70-300G, SB-800, Manfrotto 190D tripod, 141RC head, and 676B monopod.
User avatar
embi
Senior Member
 
Posts: 510
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 7:07 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon D70

Postby famish on Mon Aug 08, 2005 5:50 pm

Hi Matt, As i am way too inexperienced to suggest improvements, I can only tell you what I do and don't like. And i like No. 1 A LOT. The movement and the impression of feral seagulls appeals to me! :D

Thanks for sharing. Bring 'em on. They aren't boring me in the slightest.

Fiona
"I wish I didn't know now what I didn't know then. Against the wind, I keep runnin' against the wind."
User avatar
famish
Newbie
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 5:47 pm
Location: Neutral Bay, Sydney

Postby Matt. K on Mon Aug 08, 2005 6:41 pm

1 and 3 work very well for me. I have always liked images of people being followed by their shadows. No 3 would improve if it were printed very large. The middle image is too static to keep me involved.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby nat on Mon Aug 08, 2005 6:57 pm

Hi Matt, I agree with Fiona. Seeing seagulls going crazy is brilliant. I also think that seagulls were created with B&W photography in mind!
Number 1 for me.
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
User avatar
nat
Member
 
Posts: 161
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:07 pm
Location: Gawler, South Australia

Postby WadeM on Tue Aug 09, 2005 2:28 am

I find 1&2 lacking in contrast and 'punch'. The main lesson I learnt with black and white is there has to be absolute black and white. Shot 1 and 2 are far to middle of the road. (Obviously it's like the rule of 1/3's...some follow, some don't)

Shot 3 stands out due to the contrasting.

--Wadem
WadeM
Member
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 10:36 pm
Location: .syd.au.

Postby rokkstar on Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:41 am

Thank you for the comments people.

WadeM wrote:I find 1&2 lacking in contrast and 'punch'. The main lesson I learnt with black and white is there has to be absolute black and white. Shot 1 and 2 are far to middle of the road. (Obviously it's like the rule of 1/3's...some follow, some don't)

Shot 3 stands out due to the contrasting.

--Wadem


This is the problem I face all the time. I don't really know of a great B&W conversion which gives the contrast and punch that I'm after. I agree these are lacking in it. I can do a curves adjustment on top of the channel mixer and see how that works I guess.
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby ozczecho on Tue Aug 09, 2005 10:12 am

rokkstar, I am a big fan of your B&W street series, so keep them coming. Like everyone else #1 is my fave from this series, just for the fact that there is a lot of movement and the seagull attack is well framed....
User avatar
ozczecho
Senior Member
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:41 pm
Location: Beecroft, Sydney

Postby Willy wombat on Tue Aug 09, 2005 11:19 pm

The guy in #3 obviously has sensitive hearing... Nice centering of the subject for this shot, with the shadow distraction.

Urgh - seagulls are gross.
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Postby sirhc55 on Tue Aug 09, 2005 11:25 pm

Matt - believe it or not my choice would be #2. The evident pathos in an old man feeding the pigeons is overwhelming and beautifully caught :D
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby rokkstar on Tue Aug 09, 2005 11:48 pm

Thanks for the comments guys, I appreciate them all.

Chris, that guy was great, he was getting really uptight with the birds, and then all of a sudden just stood there. He didnt see that bird hovering in front of him and then they all flew off and he remained motionless - the light on his face i like in this one:

Image
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby tarotastic on Thu Nov 17, 2005 11:28 am

I love the pic above this post. He looks like some old assasin who has been forced out of retirement to do one last job!!

"No women, no children" - Leon
D70S
tarotastic
Member
 
Posts: 174
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 9:56 am
Location: Chatswood, Sydney

Postby Alpha_7 on Thu Nov 17, 2005 11:34 am

Really like number 3, not sure how I missed this post earlier, but number 4 is cool. The power socket in the wall almost looks photoshopped in, definitely doesn't seem to "belong" but it makes it all the more interesting.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby rokkstar on Thu Nov 17, 2005 11:56 am

THanks guys.
Wow, didnt think this post would see the light of day again.
The light socket is weird isnt it - but it's all real bro.
I really love the light on the guys face too - like old film noir photography - cept with a bloke not a hot woman.
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby rebel on Thu Nov 17, 2005 11:57 am

I hope you don't mind, a bit of contrast really helps the image out

Before
Image
After
Image

If you have photoshop just go to Image>Adjustment>Brightness/Contrast, and bump up the contrast (35 is what I did for htis photo)

Again hope you don't mind, really cool shots, I like your city shots!
------------------------
Eugene Zemlyanskiy
Flickr Gallery!
rebel
Member
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 1:04 pm
Location: Seattle WA USA

Postby Jonesy on Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:00 pm

Hey Matt... I missed this first time round as well...

No.1 is great, No.2 didn't do much for me and No.3 is my pick. Perhaps a slight adjustment in the B&W conversion fro greater contrast

nice images once again!!
D4, D700, plus glass from 14mm to 200mm
Gaffa Tape is like the FORCE... it has a Light side, a Dark side and it holds the universe together
User avatar
Jonesy
Member
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 5:41 pm
Location: Mount Gambier SA

Postby marcotrov on Thu Nov 17, 2005 9:32 pm

Terrific shots MAtt my picks are #2 and #3. Try cropping the top of #2 a little to remove the distracting ca top of image , almost panorama shot and I think it looks even more effective. Like 'em Matt :wink: Back to scanning photos for my wife's 50th, it's getting bigger than Ben Hur! :roll:
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques