Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by gleff on Sat Jul 23, 2005 9:14 pm
I realise this isn't a great shot, but it's pretty cool to be able to get this detail and sharpness without a tripod.
I just pointed the camera at the moon.. hand held.. and took the shot.. Exif data is:
Iso 800
Manual Mode
Aperture, F7.1
Shutter, 1/60s
Shot is cropped to get rid of all the black sky hence the loss in some quality.
Obviously, the original is much better quality.
Geoff
http://www.gleff.com
_________________
D70, 18-70 kit , 80-400VR, 24-120VR, Sigma 10-20, SB800, Benro A328, KB-2 Ballhead
-

gleff
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 502
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 1:49 pm
- Location: Chatswood, NSW - Nikon D70
-
by thaddeus on Sat Jul 23, 2005 9:34 pm
just for my understanding, why didn't you shoot it at iso200?
-

thaddeus
- Member
-
- Posts: 418
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 10:04 pm
- Location: Sydney
by gleff on Sat Jul 23, 2005 9:43 pm
thaddeus wrote:just for my understanding, why didn't you shoot it at iso200?
Because the shutter speed probably would have been too slow and VR probably wouldn't have helped..
I could have experimented and POSSIBLY used iso 200.. I just wanted to try a shot without much fiddling too see the advantages to VR.
Geoff
http://www.gleff.com
_________________
D70, 18-70 kit , 80-400VR, 24-120VR, Sigma 10-20, SB800, Benro A328, KB-2 Ballhead
-

gleff
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 502
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 1:49 pm
- Location: Chatswood, NSW - Nikon D70
-
by Jamie on Sat Jul 23, 2005 10:20 pm
You are using a 80 - 400 VR and you dont have a tripod?
Not a bad effort really for such a big lens and at that shutter speed.
Jamie
-
Jamie
- Member
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:40 pm
- Location: Hoppers Crossing, Melbourne <D70>
-
by Nnnnsic on Sat Jul 23, 2005 10:26 pm
Nice shot but you need some sharpening.
Also, why didn't you just lower the aperture and lower the ISO with it?
-

Nnnnsic
- I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
-
- Posts: 7770
- Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
- Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW
-
by gleff on Sat Jul 23, 2005 10:30 pm
Nnnnsic wrote:Nice shot but you need some sharpening.
Also, why didn't you just lower the aperture and lower the ISO with it?
Actually, the original was sharp as a tack. It lost a fair bit in the cropping, and conversion to jpg.
I suppose I could have lowered the aperture, but isn't the sweet spot a little higher than the lowest setting.. anyway, . If I truly wanted a great shot, I would have played a bit more, but I was just amazed at what I could produce at a whim shot.
Geoff
http://www.gleff.com
_________________
D70, 18-70 kit , 80-400VR, 24-120VR, Sigma 10-20, SB800, Benro A328, KB-2 Ballhead
-

gleff
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 502
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 1:49 pm
- Location: Chatswood, NSW - Nikon D70
-
by Matt. K on Sun Jul 24, 2005 12:14 am
Geoff
You are gonna love that lens! It's a new dimension in photography. 
Regards
Matt. K
-

Matt. K
- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
-
- Posts: 9981
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: North Nowra
by birddog114 on Sun Jul 24, 2005 12:17 am
Geoff,
You should not regret to be the owner of that lens! I still have mine and going to keep it!
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-

birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
by gstark on Sun Jul 24, 2005 1:27 pm
gleff wrote:I realise this isn't a great shot, but it's pretty cool to be able to get this detail and sharpness without a tripod.
I just pointed the camera at the moon.. hand held.. and took the shot.. Exif data is:
Iso 800 Manual Mode Aperture, F7.1 Shutter, 1/60s
I'm puzzled. From memory, I shot my moonshot a couple pf months back, handheld, @ about f/8, 1/400, ISO 200, and same lens.
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by gleff on Sun Jul 24, 2005 2:11 pm
gstark wrote:gleff wrote:I realise this isn't a great shot, but it's pretty cool to be able to get this detail and sharpness without a tripod.
I just pointed the camera at the moon.. hand held.. and took the shot.. Exif data is:
Iso 800 Manual Mode Aperture, F7.1 Shutter, 1/60s
I'm puzzled. From memory, I shot my moonshot a couple pf months back, handheld, @ about f/8, 1/400, ISO 200, and same lens.
Don't be puzzled.. this is me we're talking about.. I just assumed it wouldn't work at 200 so I tried it at 800.. no fiddling, or experimentation was done.. Had I purposely tried for a great shot, I would have experimented more
Geoff
http://www.gleff.com
_________________
D70, 18-70 kit , 80-400VR, 24-120VR, Sigma 10-20, SB800, Benro A328, KB-2 Ballhead
-

gleff
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 502
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 1:49 pm
- Location: Chatswood, NSW - Nikon D70
-
by gstark on Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:10 pm
gleff wrote:gstark wrote:gleff wrote:I realise this isn't a great shot, but it's pretty cool to be able to get this detail and sharpness without a tripod.
I just pointed the camera at the moon.. hand held.. and took the shot.. Exif data is:
Iso 800 Manual Mode Aperture, F7.1 Shutter, 1/60s
I'm puzzled. From memory, I shot my moonshot a couple pf months back, handheld, @ about f/8, 1/400, ISO 200, and same lens.
Don't be puzzled.. this is me we're talking about.. I just assumed it wouldn't work at 200 so I tried it at 800.. no fiddling, or experimentation was done.. Had I purposely tried for a great shot, I would have experimented more 
Then your course of action is crystal clear, my son.
Er, moon.
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by robboh on Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:30 pm
Nice shot Geoff. You can see that its sharp in the original coz of the detail in the craters at the top. If you are shooting the moon, try and keep the shutter speed to a max of 1/100s. Any slower and you will start to get slight blurring due to the movement of the moon itself.
Smile; it makes people wonder what you have been up to.
-

robboh
- Member
-
- Posts: 455
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 7:50 pm
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|