
D70 + 18-70 kit lens. 1/60 f22. ISO 200 -0.3EV. Handheld
regards,
Arthur
SugarLoaf ReserviorModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
26 posts
• Page 1 of 1
SugarLoaf Reservior![]() D70 + 18-70 kit lens. 1/60 f22. ISO 200 -0.3EV. Handheld regards, Arthur
a beautiful pix ..........but I have had to put a book under the right side of the monitor
cheers big pix Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Terrific shot Arthur very catching, I like shots of the water's edge with strong reflections and bold colour... Might dribble off the edge though
![]() Like the way the image is framed and titled too, looks good without over-powering the image itself. Cheers. Aka Andrew
Sorry Arthur - I'm also a card carrying member of the straight line police
![]() Otherwise this is one excellent shot. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Hey mudder - did you mean framed and tilted??? ![]() ![]() Sorry Arthur - couldn't resist... Nice pic... Where is that??? Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
I tend to disagree about the sloping, I think it's an optical illusion. There is a ree in the photo which is perfectly perpendicular which seems to suggest that the photo is straight as it is.
... Then again I do wear glasses. __________
Phillip **Nikon D7000**
thanksThanks everyone for the advice. I am new to landscape photography. Is it a must to always have straight lines? I thought that only applies to architecture photography?
Hi Mudder, You went for the Landscape photo course at Great Ocean Road, didn't you. Can you share what was taught concerning this? Sugarload Reserviour is north east Melbourne. It is water catchment area. Very nice place but no so easy to navigate to. It was my first visit there. cheers, Arthur
You don't necessarily have to have a straight horizon in all landscape photography, it depends on what outcome you want out of your photo. Ideally you would have it (as majority of the landscape photos I've seen do it) but an ideal photo is in the eye of the beholder.
Truthfully at first I thought the photo was crooked and was about to mention about straightening photo, but then I realised it's not crooked...just the dumb natural shore ![]() Technicalities aside, I like the photo alot because of the reflections. My only picky gripe would be to crop out the rocky shoreline(?) at the bottom right and see how that looks. Great colours! ![]() ![]()
Nice one Arthur, but clone out those two leafy clumps at the bottom right...oh and the dust bunny around that same area as well
![]()
I like both pics Arthur but I would suggest you change ”Reservior” to Reservoir - to be correct
![]() Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Arthur
I liked the first one, but the second pic is outstanding. Great use of reflection and a really good camera angle. I'd also clone the bottom right foreground stuff. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
HI
Wow. Have you visited the place again since? How long it took to build the dam. It's a huge dam. Very deep on the other side where the river "zigzag" through the valleys. regards, Arthur
Re: HI
Hi Arthur, I was there towards the end of construction, probably around 1983 from memory. I think about five years to construct the dam wall. There's a whole lot of other interesting infrastructure there, particularly the "clearwater reservoir" where the treated water is stored before it heads out through the main pipeline to Preston reservoir. The clearwater reservoir is an enclosed concrete structure and about the size of the MCG, all interior concrete surfaces are polished. I haven't been there since about 1985. Cheers Peter my karma just ran over your dogma
G'day Arthur, I really like these images, prefer the first as there's something in the foreground to take me across the reflections of the water, maybe try placing the horizon either lower or higher to make the image portray what it is you're more interested in, in the first maybe raise the horizon so the foreground has more presence as the sky while a beatiful blue doesn't have many features or textures... Please take this as mere ramblings from someone who knows nought about how to make a good, emotive image... ![]() The landscape work-shop down at Port Campbell was great fun, I approached it as something fun to do more than an instructional course, but I think it was invaluable for me as I certainly don't have any photographic skill or creativity, and find it difficult to conceive what it is I'm trying to portray to the viewer... But it's fun to share a memory of a location or event with others ![]() The main things discussed at the workshop were: - Rule of thirds - Foreground interest - Don't be afraid to try and look from an alternative perspective - Examine the entire frame (including the four corners) and only include what's necessary - What is your point of interest in your image, does your image have points of interest that draws the viewer to your subject - Leading lines, draw the viewer to your subject/focal point - Horizon lines, is the subject the foreground or the sky etc.? generally devote (say) two thirds of the image to your interesting subject (eg: don't use the middle for a horizon unless you want to for a reason) - Don't only go to a location once and then think I've been there so there's nothing new for me there, go back again at a different time of day or season and get a different image or perspective. Probably the most interesting part was the evening critique of the day's shots and how each person viewed the same scene differently, and how the differences impacted upon the viewer. Can't wait for the waterfall work-shop in the Otways end of July, the week-end before the D70 maxi-meet, that'll be a blast... I need to be more creative with the PP of my waterfall images though to give more emotion to the scene, rather than just a snapshot... Cheers mate. PS: Sorry for the long post... Aka Andrew
Andrew
Sometimes long posts are necessary when there's a lot to impart and this is a case in point. Thanks for sharing these tips. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Hi Andrew,
thanks a lot for sharing. I found the point of going back and looking and shooting again very true. The other points made are also very helpful. Cheers Christian
Previous topic • Next topic
26 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|