King of the Jungle....(3 pics)

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

King of the Jungle....(3 pics)

Postby Aussie Dave on Mon Mar 28, 2005 3:40 pm

User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby owen on Mon Mar 28, 2005 3:47 pm

Wow, for a minute I thought you had taken a shot of my cat! lol

Here's yoda
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v198/ ... emaker.jpg



Nice shots though, that lens is great!
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Postby Manta on Mon Mar 28, 2005 3:51 pm

Great shots Dave.

The first doesn't do a great deal for me probably because it's the standard 'cat' photo. The second is my favourite - I love the boke and the look on the cat's face.
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby Aussie Dave on Mon Mar 28, 2005 3:58 pm

owen wrote:Wow, for a minute I thought you had taken a shot of my cat! lol

Here's yoda
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v198/ ... emaker.jpg



Nice shots though, that lens is great!


now that's scary.....I know cats can look very similar but that is amazing.
I love the glow in the eyes you captured !
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby jethro on Mon Mar 28, 2005 4:46 pm

like the 3rd shot has a bit of tiger about it.
shoot it real.

look! and see. Shoot and feel
User avatar
jethro
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1006
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 10:03 pm
Location: down south, sydney

Postby stubbsy on Mon Mar 28, 2005 6:21 pm

Dave - all three shots are good, but the third one appeals most to me since it captures that classic half asleep don't give a $$#@$ cat attitude.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Aussie Dave on Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:45 pm

thanks everyone for your comments.

No critisisms ?!?

Is there anything that you think I could have done better ?

I was privileged to have a few minutes of his time before he politely stood, meowed, then walked away.....but that's nothing new.

I'm starting to really like the Sigma 70-300 APO II. Hopefully one day I will be lucky enough to join the 70-200VR group. And as for the D70, well does anything have to be said....???
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby SoCal Steve on Mon Mar 28, 2005 8:03 pm

Good first posts, Dave.
Since you've asked for some constructive criticisms, here's what I would offer up;
Re: 1st Picture: IMO (in my opinion) the depth of field is a litte too shallow, unless that was your intent. The eyes are in focus, which is, of course, the most important thing, but almost everything in front and behind are pretty soft. I also find the color to be a little flat and monotone. I'm guessing the kitty's fur actually has a much richer, colorful appearance to it. Again, just my $0.02.

Hope that you accept these comments in the spirit with which they are intended. Your framing shows that you already know your way around Photoshop or other post processing program that you're using.

I look forward to seeing more of your shots.
Cheers, Dave.
Hard work pays off in the future. Laziness pays off now.
User avatar
SoCal Steve
Senior Member
 
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 6:25 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Postby Manta on Mon Mar 28, 2005 8:10 pm

Again, Dave, merely in the spirit of offerening you something to work with in the future: Either the original first image or the crop you did on it severed poor kitty's left ear and chin! Apart from this, I think Steve made some good comments but, overall, they were pretty good shots anyway.

Look forward to more.

:D :D :D
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby Aussie Dave on Mon Mar 28, 2005 8:15 pm

thanks SoCal & Simon. That's what I was looking for.

I did unfortunately cut off the chin etc... in the original pic, so no amount of PP will fix that.

When I get some more time, I might try playing with the colours in PSCS and see if I can't make those pics a little better, as suggested.

I appreciate your "honest" comments.
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby Manta on Mon Mar 28, 2005 8:20 pm

Aussie Dave wrote:I did unfortunately cut off the chin etc... in the original pic, so no amount of PP will fix that.


Ahh, now come on Dave - where's your sense of adventure?? CS is all you need!! :wink:
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby Aussie Dave on Mon Mar 28, 2005 8:29 pm

Manta wrote:Ahh, now come on Dave - where's your sense of adventure?? CS is all you need!! :wink:


:lol: I'm still working at making something out of nothing. I figure when I finally succeed, I can sell my D70 and just create the images from scratch in PSCS. Then I'll have the detail of a D2X with the versatility of a 8-3000mm VR lens - if not more !
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby Aussie Dave on Mon Mar 28, 2005 8:48 pm

which version do you think looks the best ?

Original Version...
Image

Version Two...
Image
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby mudder on Mon Mar 28, 2005 9:24 pm

G'day, great first posts...
Of the original 3, #2 does it for me... The clarity of the intense eyes looking across the frame is nicely done... Seems really sharp too. The first just misses the frame...

Of the two later ones the second with the stronger contrast grabs my eye first...

Cheers,
Mudder
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby SoCal Steve on Mon Mar 28, 2005 10:40 pm

Aussie Dave - Creating photos in Photoshop without using any camera is something Bert Monroy does all the time. I don't think anyone else can match him, though.

This is a page from one of his books on Amazon.com. Absolutely everything he does is drawn. No photo images whatsoever.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0735712468/ref=sib_dp_pt/104-8448285-5831917#reader-page
Hard work pays off in the future. Laziness pays off now.
User avatar
SoCal Steve
Senior Member
 
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 6:25 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques