Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by tasadam on Thu Mar 24, 2005 11:47 am
Hi everyone. Time to bite the bullet and share the fun I've been having. Got my camera late December. Recent trip to Wineglass Bay in Tasmania, 1300 odd photos later in 3 days, doing the sorting and found this one that I was PARTICULARLY happy with. This photo is as it was, no cropping, no photoshopping. Downsized original photo to 800x531, resultant photo 66Kb. Nitty gritty - Focal Length 130 mm F-Number F 4.2 Exposure Time 1/1250 sec Metering Mode Pattern Exposure Program Normal ISO 200 Focus Mode AF-C No exposure compensation No flash My own criticism - As I had junk on the camera sensor and couldn't get it sent away due to this pending trip, I was using a narrow depth of field, to reduce the evidence of black spot (none present in this photo). The result is the tail feathers perfectly focused but the wings slightly not. It doesn't detract from the photo at all - with the drops of water from the feet and the wave coming in, a fast shutter has probably served the photo better than slightly more depth of field to catch the wings clearer. What do you think? 
Last edited by tasadam on Mon Oct 13, 2008 1:36 am, edited 2 times in total.
-

tasadam
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 10:57 am
- Location: Near Devonport, Tasmania
-
by birddog114 on Thu Mar 24, 2005 11:49 am
Duck again and again!
We will have Peking duck for Easter 
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-

birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
by sirhc55 on Thu Mar 24, 2005 11:54 am
The slight blurring of the wing tips adds to the sense of motion IMO. Nice duck 
Chris -------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
-

sirhc55
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
by dhess on Fri Mar 25, 2005 1:42 pm
Which lens did you use and what focal length?
-
dhess
- Member
-
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 2:18 pm
- Location: Brisbane
by bago100 on Fri Mar 25, 2005 2:23 pm
Nice photo Tasadam
I think the tail spread is the human equivalent of reverse thrust
Graham
-

bago100
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 862
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 6:42 pm
- Location: Shanghai China until Feb 2010
by ozimax on Sat Mar 26, 2005 11:33 pm
Good one, Max
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse) Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
-

ozimax
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5289
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
- Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW
by tasadam on Sun Mar 27, 2005 4:27 pm
dhess wrote:Which lens did you use and what focal length?
The lens was the 70-300G lens that comes in the kit when you buy the D70 with the 2 lenses (the other being the 18-70). Quite a light weight lens but I like what it can do! Thanks for the comments and hey Birddog enjoy your peking duck! A few frames after this pic I took another - the bird in the water took off and they flew together as is here. I realy like the closeness of the wings to the water, gives it a sense of drama or something. Cheers Adam. 
Last edited by tasadam on Mon Oct 13, 2008 1:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
-

tasadam
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 10:57 am
- Location: Near Devonport, Tasmania
-
by Killakoala on Sun Mar 27, 2005 5:12 pm
That's quite nice for the 70-300G. i like the way the wings are in opposition to each other, one up, the other down. Great snap. Well done.
Steve. |D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.comLeeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
-

Killakoala
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5398
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: Southland NZ
-
by mudder on Sun Mar 27, 2005 6:39 pm
G'day, welcome to the bunch, you can call yourself and old hand now after a couple
Really like the second one for great timing. Don;t worry about the dust spots, just practice the healing brush in PS like I do
Cheers.
Aka Andrew
-

mudder
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3020
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Burwood East
-
by meicw on Sun Mar 27, 2005 8:08 pm
Adam, Welcome. I really like both pics. Well caught.
Regards
Meicw
-
meicw
- Member
-
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 2:12 pm
- Location: Melbourne (Reservoir), Canon 5D
by tasadam on Fri Apr 01, 2005 4:21 pm
Thanks to those for their comments.
There's a lot of great photos taken by a lot of members!
Oh wouldn't Broadband be nice! Then it wouldn't be so painful looking through them all, er, trying to look anyway.
C'mon Telstra, pull your finger out!
-

tasadam
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 10:57 am
- Location: Near Devonport, Tasmania
-
by sirhc55 on Fri Apr 01, 2005 4:25 pm
Adam - a camera is only a tool and your second photo proves that capturing the moment is something that YOU have done well.
Chris -------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
-

sirhc55
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
by Deano on Sat Apr 02, 2005 1:42 am
Adam,
I like your shots. I really want to get some good birds-in-flight shots but I have only tried from below and the exposure is a 'mare. You've done a goot job with the birds against the water.
I would crop the sitting bird out of the first one. As for the second I reckon removing the ocean on left, bottom and a smidge off the top would look great. Then you get a tighter crop left and bottom with space right and top for the birds to fly into.
I frequently take copies of shots I see on this forum and try a few crops. Let me know if you want to see what I like for the second shot.
Cheers
Dean
I intend to live forever. So far, so good.
D2x | Nikkor 24-120vr & 50/1.8 | Sigma 12-24 & 24-70/2.8 & 70-200/2.8 | SB800 | Velbon 640CF Tripod w/ Markins M10 & RRS plates. And then there's my Bag Collection... Sweeet....;-)
-

Deano
- Member
-
- Posts: 319
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 4:57 pm
- Location: Canberra, Australia
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|