105mm VR micro nikkorModerator: Moderators 
		
			Forum rules 
	Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. 
            Previous topic • Next topic 
			45 posts
			 • Page 1 of 1
		 
	
 More NLD  
                  
            Is AF-S help in macro shooting? I don't see the point, perhaps with VR, look at the build of the new micro AF-S VR, I don't see its quality will surpass the old version. Birddog114
 
		VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace 
 I'm a Nikon fan, but I don't hold my confidence over Nikon new lenses which recently released. 
 
                  
            The 18-200 is out of my sight! perhaps also this new Micro AF-S VR 105. Birddog114
 
		VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace 
 
 Yes, I agree and won't see much value of the new series. I rather holding and keep the old lenses in my bag than sourcing these new plasticky, cheaply made and perhaps quality is also on the down side. Last edited by birddog114 on Tue Feb 21, 2006 9:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
					
				 
			Birddog114
 
		VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace 
 Could be useful, if VR works exceptionally. Don't think it'll ever be as good as a tripod though. 
                  
            HB 
		
 
 Well, tripod is a must for serious macro shooter. Birddog114
 
		VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace 
 I don’t see any point in having VR on a macro lens. Most shots would be taken with flash as f stops from f/22 and up would require flash anyway  
                  
            Chris 
		-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left 
 
 Chris, it's a joke! and tempting the newbie in shooting macro! Another marketing hype. Birddog114
 
		VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace 
 
 Birddog - sometimes age plays a significant part in the experience of life Chris 
		-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left 
 I have the conventional lens so wont be getting one.
 
                  
            seems to me that a lot of macro stuff would be on tripods also. do we really wish to shoot high magifications at slower speeds anyhow?? seems to be of limited value to me! Still they will probably sell heaps. steve check out my image gallery @ 
		http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3 
 
 
 
 It’s not exactly a portrait lens and would not have the versatility of, for example, the Nikkor 17-55mm Chris 
		-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left 
 sweet! a VR with micro... what a great idea! 
                  
            New page
 
		http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome 
 
 
 Wow - my dream lens would be the 70-300 G VR   f4-5.6  
                  
            Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams
 
		http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy 
 what a lenswow. what a lens.  Well done, Nikon.
 
                  
            
		regards, Arthur 
 
 Why only from 'near infinity to 3m'? What about at infinity and closer than 3m? To me the VR would be most interesting for macro work.... this sounds like it won't be as good at close range? Paul http://www.australiandigitalphotography.com
 
		Living in poverty due to my addiction to NIKON... Is there a clinic that can help me? 
 Blackstormy,
 
                  
            Could be the 70-300 G VR f4-5.6 in the horizon. Birddog114
 
		VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace 
 Not that I'd be able to afford it...
 
                  
            But to add to the: 70-200 VR 200-400 VR I'd like to see a 400-800 VR Those few (and a couple of others Kinda hard to transport though. I struggle with the gear I have Paul http://www.australiandigitalphotography.com
 
		Living in poverty due to my addiction to NIKON... Is there a clinic that can help me? 
 I don't think you'll see anything in the 800 range by Nikon, Paul.
 
                  
            They could do a zoom upto 600, I think they'd want to keep the aperture at F4 and allow people to use TCs to increase the focal length which would I guess be a lighter option then what an 800 F5.6 would be. Would be nice if the 300-600 was variable apeture F2.8-4 Darryl  (aka Kipper) 
		Nikon D200 
 Nikonuser + kipper,
 
                  
            Go to your own bed and have your sweet dream Birddog114
 
		VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace 
 
 Yeah I figured the same thing... just dreaming. In a way I'm glad anyway because I'd never be able to afford/justify it. The 500 f4 secondhand was as good as I can afford (not that it is in any way bad!!) without making money from the photos. Back on topic: I can't see myself buying the 105VR macro for the VR (although I might be in the market for a 105 macro soon). As was mentioned above, I don't think the VR would add much to macro shots as I do most of mine on a tripod and at higher shutter speeds with flash anyway. http://www.australiandigitalphotography.com
 
		Living in poverty due to my addiction to NIKON... Is there a clinic that can help me? 
 but I was kidding  
                  
            Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams
 
		http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy 
 Rel, When are you getting the 105mm VR Micro??   
                  
            Tim D70 - D200/MBD200 Coming soon - Too Much Gear, Not Enough Talent 
		My Site: http://www.digitalstill.net My Fishing Site: http://www.fishseq.com 
   
I agree with some of the others. I don't want to shoot with slower shutter speeds. Generally I use 1/500 for my insect shots. VR might be handy if no flash was being used. 
 I cant remember the last time I used a tripod for macro shots. I consider a tripod virtually useless when shooting small flying insects etc. 
 I use AF-C in approximately 75% of my insect shots. 
 
 I will be mostly be capturing stationary objects eg wedding rings, with available light so the VR would be a great help 
 The Internal Focussing and the Nano Crystal Coat will be nice features even if the VR is near useless. BTW, how long have Nikon had an Australian website? 
                  
            
		
 Pop this in a housing and it might be a nice lens for macro when diving.  It is hard enough to hold the camera steady in a current and you get wierd looks when you take a tripod diving (and yes, I have done this)
 
                  
            
		Ant. 
 Why not build a teleconverter with VR and be done with it? Now that I COULD use!!
 
                  
            Don't suppose the optics would work like that, though, so it's probably not possible. But a nice idea! VR is great from my limited use of it, but in a 105 micro? I'm happy with the original D lens as it is. Share what you know, learn what you don't. 
		Wilderness Photography of Tasmania http://www.tasmaniart.com.au 
 
 I don't know if it is physically possible but it would be commercial suicide from nikon. Selling one item would not be anywhere near as profitable as selling a heap of different VR lenses. __________ 
		Phillip **Nikon D7000** 
 
 Adam, That is similar to how the Konica Minolta system works, VR in the body, any old lens becomes VR 
 
 One day I will think of something original and retire rich. Always the optimist. Share what you know, learn what you don't. 
		Wilderness Photography of Tasmania http://www.tasmaniart.com.au 
 Someone has had a play with one here:
 
                  
            
		http://www.nikoncafe.com/vforums/showthread.php?t=64014 
 
            Previous topic • Next topic  
			45 posts
			 • Page 1 of 1
		 
	
 |