Cheers
Scott
The original!!!
DSLRUsers.com
A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
Digitally edited?Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Digitally edited?
Who can tell me how this is digitally edited? I will give one clue! I have altered 1 person 2 x in the photo!!! And they are fairly major alterations in my mind... Plus how does the photo look? C&C welcome!!!
Cheers Scott
The original!!! Last edited by Muzza22au on Wed Dec 07, 2005 1:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nikon D80, Nikkor VR 80-400mm, Nikkor 18-135mm (kit lense), 90mm 2.8 macro, Tamron 2x AF TC
My Photos
I think that Owen's spot on.
There's still some of the sky left in the area adjacent to his hair whee it intersects with the building's roof, on the rh side as we view the image. Reasonably well done however, but this image still needs some serious curves work, btw. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Very good! Yeah I will have to finish it off alittle better and as said do more work with curves... Cheers Scott Nikon D80, Nikkor VR 80-400mm, Nikkor 18-135mm (kit lense), 90mm 2.8 macro, Tamron 2x AF TC
My Photos
The hand on the shoulder, I don't think it belongs to the guy in the red shirt. Apart from looking a tad over sized in relation to his body AND in the wrong position in relation to his shoulder, it's also got a blue sleeve.
Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
It actually does belong there, I think the blue sleeve that you are seeing is his watch. Nikon D80, Nikkor VR 80-400mm, Nikkor 18-135mm (kit lense), 90mm 2.8 macro, Tamron 2x AF TC
My Photos
I think the blue sleeve is actually a wrist watch...
I must admit that the hand on the shoulder is very odd. The guy it is supposed to belong to has his shoulder going down which, perspectively, would mean that his arm must be ultra long.
Just seen the original and now know why the hand looked odd. The shoulder in the original is obviously at the right angle for the hand. Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Thats another thing I am going to have to fix aswell. Well back to the drawing board... Nikon D80, Nikkor VR 80-400mm, Nikkor 18-135mm (kit lense), 90mm 2.8 macro, Tamron 2x AF TC
My Photos
The hand on the shoulder threw me off too.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
- Mods Database • The team • Delete all board cookies • Reset blocks • All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]
