magic macros and colors

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

magic macros and colors

Postby KerryPierce on Sun Nov 20, 2005 4:33 pm

I tried to take these shots hand held, first with the 180, then with the 80-400vr, but the light levels were too low. :(

So, I dug out the manfrotto tripod and went at it again.

Nikon D70 ,Sigma 180mm f/3.5 EX APO Macro IF HSM
1/50s f/29.0 at 185.0mm iso1600 on tripod

Image

Nikon D70 ,Sigma 180mm f/3.5 EX APO Macro IF HSM
1/40s f/29.0 at 185.0mm iso1600 on tripod

Image

Nikon D70 ,Sigma 180mm f/3.5 EX APO Macro IF HSM
1/15s f/29.0 at 185.0mm iso1600 on tripod

Image
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby marcotrov on Sun Nov 20, 2005 4:40 pm

Terrific abstracts Kerrie. The play of light, contrast, creativity and colour. Beautifully composed. :) SOme details on set up if you would? :)

I have ordered my Canon 500D closeup lens with Birdy can't wait for its arrival. :)
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby ozimax on Sun Nov 20, 2005 6:30 pm

Excellent abstract Kerry, love the first one especially, Max
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby Alpha_7 on Sun Nov 20, 2005 6:33 pm

I'd really like to know what the subject is, is it Ice ? or Glass ? Or something else ?
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby stubbsy on Sun Nov 20, 2005 8:13 pm

Kerry
I have no bloody idea what I'm looking at, but I like it. All three are good, but #1 shines for me.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby stormygirl on Sun Nov 20, 2005 8:26 pm

:shock: Geez Kerry, these are amazing! Water? Glass? Perspex with bubbles? The first is beautiful, great colour and detail. Well done!
User avatar
stormygirl
Senior Member
 
Posts: 554
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 8:46 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC

Postby KerryPierce on Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:06 am

Thanks all, for the kind remarks. :D

These were made from a sheet of ice, about 1" (2.5cm) thick, out of the dog's water bowl. I stood the ice on edge, with an edge tward the sun, to illuminate the interior. The colors came from shooting different POVs. I have no idea what caused the bubbles in the ice. :?

Marco; hope you enjoy the 500d as I do. :)
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby BBJ on Mon Nov 21, 2005 8:05 am

Hi Kerry, no doubt about it mate when you get into these things you can bet they gonna look great as all your pics do and this is amazing for what it is. Very creative mate and came up well.
cheers
John
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40
http://www.oz-images.com
User avatar
BBJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3651
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:49 pm
Location: Mt Gambier South Australia-D70-D2X

Postby moggy on Mon Nov 21, 2005 9:52 am

Great images Kerry, hard to believe it's just water. Magic stuff. :)

8) Bob.

.
User avatar
moggy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 852
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Castle Hill, Sydney. - Fixed D70s

Postby sirhc55 on Mon Nov 21, 2005 9:55 am

Excellent shots Kerry with #1 a standout.

A thought on the bubbles: possibly bacteria reaction in the water prior to snap freezing could have caused this effect :roll:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby KerryPierce on Mon Nov 21, 2005 11:00 am

Thanks again, guys. :D

Chris: Interesting thought on the cause of the bubbles, but I have no clue. I thought it was a little strange, but happy for the photo op. :)
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby johnd on Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:13 pm

G'day Kerry, welcome back, haven't seen much from you lately.

ISO 1600, wow. How do you get away with ISO 1600 without any noise. I've seen other shots of yours taken at high ISO before and I'm really interested to know what techniques you use to eliminate noise at such high ISOs. Could you please give a hint of your techniques?
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby Alpha_7 on Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:20 pm

John good pick up on the ISO...


ISO 1600 :shock: :shock: :shock: And still they look so great, with no noticeable noise issues...

Thumbs Up Kerry!
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby KerryPierce on Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:30 pm

johnd wrote:G'day Kerry, welcome back, haven't seen much from you lately.

ISO 1600, wow. How do you get away with ISO 1600 without any noise. I've seen other shots of yours taken at high ISO before and I'm really interested to know what techniques you use to eliminate noise at such high ISOs. Could you please give a hint of your techniques?


Hi John, Thanks for the kind remarks. :D

These shots all had some minor NR with Noiseware and Noise Ninja plugins for CS2. They weren't all that bad, though. As for reducing apparent noise, my experiences are that the better your exposure, the less intrusive the noise. IIRC, I was running about +.6EV on these shots. Of course, there's not much to be done about noise in the deep shadow areas of very high contrast shots, but if you can avoid that, you should be able to minimize the apparent noise by ensuring that your shots are properly or slightly overexposed.
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby KerryPierce on Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:31 pm

Alpha_7 wrote:John good pick up on the ISO...


ISO 1600 :shock: :shock: :shock: And still they look so great, with no noticeable noise issues...

Thumbs Up Kerry!


Thanks for the kind comments, John. :D
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques