[POR] Some more portraiture of a more attractive nature

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

[POR] Some more portraiture of a more attractive nature

Postby rokkstar on Sun Nov 20, 2005 7:37 pm

Still on my portrait phase at the moment viewers.
This time Sam agreed to model for me and has graciously allowed me to post them. Once again would appreciate feedback on the style as much as the composition and lighting etc.

Image
Image

Thank you
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby Raskill on Sun Nov 20, 2005 7:44 pm

Yes, definetly a more attractive model this time :lol:

I like number three the most. I dont like the crop on the first two, a partial amount of the mouth detracts from them I think. Either the whole face or the eyes and nose only. But thats just my thoughts. The lighting in all four is really good!

I like number three because the 'crop' is right (for my likings), the photo has an intimimate feel to it, as does your models expression, also the bit of bra strap makes it seem more intimimate (or maybe I'm just a perv).

Nice images mate.
2x D700, 2x D2h, lenses, speedlights, studio, pelican cases, tripods, monopods, patridges, pear trees etc etc

http://www.awbphotos.com.au
User avatar
Raskill
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2161
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:26 pm
Location: Rockley, near Bathurst, Home of Aussie Motorsport!

Postby rokkstar on Sun Nov 20, 2005 10:05 pm

Raskill,

Thanks for the comments.
Number 3 has the most alluring feel to it I think but I don't neccessarily think it's the best shot. The eye contact is good and the bra strap adds that intimate aspect, but I prefer number 1 personally. Not sure if it's because I am too close to the images but i didn;t even see the crop. I have got to learn to have an unbiased eye and judge the images on their content.

Many thanks again.
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby paulvdb1 on Sun Nov 20, 2005 10:33 pm

I like the hat in 1 and 2 - I think it adds an element of modeling to what could be simply snapshots otherwise. I prefer #2 as it's in focus. I don't think much of shooting close and out of focus. I'm not entirely convinced about the crop through the mouth - I'd have preferred no mouth or full mouth.

#3 works heaps better than 4 for me as she's looking up with a more interesting facial expression - adds intrigue. #4 Sam looks to casual, and lighting catches her wrong.

P.S. Matt - you might have to find a less noisy lounge. :lol:
Regards, Paul Vandenberg

D7000 (D70S retired) - 18-70mm, 50mm F1.8, 35mm F2, Sigma 70-300mm
paulvdb1
Member
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:22 pm
Location: NW Sydney

Postby sirhc55 on Sun Nov 20, 2005 10:33 pm

With due respect to Sam, who is very beautiful, these shots are no where as good as the shots of yourself.

IMO #3 and #4 are bad angles that do not flatter, sorry.

#1 - the OOF factor does not IMO work with the right hand side being so dark.

#2 just does not work - the crop through the lips draws my eyes to this constantly.

I also noticed that in every shot Sam’s eyes are looking straight at the camera - this is OK, sometimes, but very often having the eyes looking slightly to the side or even down creates a better effect.

You can beat me up on Saturday Matt :wink:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Willy wombat on Sun Nov 20, 2005 10:44 pm

I like the eye contact in #3. I liken them to 'come to bed eyes' so its a bit sexy.

#4 is a bad angle.

I prefer the lighting of the eyes in #2 to #1. More "white" in the left eye but the right cheak looks a bit hot in #2.

Good to see you experimenting! And lucky you to have models to shoot.
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Postby marcotrov on Sun Nov 20, 2005 11:49 pm

I agree with Chris and Willy Wombat your self portraits were brilliant. These photos of clearly an attractive young woman are not flattering. #1 and #2 have potential but like the rest the perspective is not quite right. Good sharpness in the eyes in #2 but with these type of shots, IMO, you either focus on the eye as a band of interest or not. It seems #1 and #2 there is either too much showing of the face or not enough.

There ia a warmth, intimacy or softness, if you like, in all the photos that is very attractive. I dare say the model plays a considerable role in this. :) :wink:
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques