DSLRUsers.com
A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
The same night meet as every one elseModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
The same night meet as every one else
I was there at the night meet on the 12Nov as well.
Ooooo... I like the second and the last one most... but they're all nice.
 Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Andrew
A great bunch of captures of which the first and last are the best for me. The composition in the last one in particular is a great angle on a very overphotographed location. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Gorgeous shots, some lovely colours in the reflections and as Peter said a refreashing look at well photographed landmark. Thanks for sharing.
Nothings more "over-photographed" on this forum than sunsets and ducks. And guys who wear hats labelled with "FREAK'. Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Great shots Huynhie, and just because something is overphotographed doesn't mean we should stop taking photos of it. (With the exception of freakin' guys in freakin' freak hats!) We have a harbour the envy of many which includes the Opera House and the Harbour Bridge and both look spectacular paticularly at night. IMHO.
 Bob.
.
Well as best as I can recall there is at most three shots of he Forensic Freak here. On reflection I guess that makes him overphotographed after the first one.  Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Funilly enough Rich, after shooting with slide film for numerous years and only owning a digital camera for 5 months. I still have not come to terms with the idea of cropping an image. So all the shots that you see are straight out of the camera with postprocessing and no cropping.  Last edited by huynhie on Wed Nov 16, 2005 8:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
3 and 5 do it for me.....but they are all great.
"Sometimes when you are sad Poko, it's good to hug the monkey."
either way well done 
I thought it was a crop from the one above it because the exposure was soo similar. D70, 18-70 DX, Sigma 70-300 APOII, Nikkor 50mm 1.4D, SB800, Bogen 3046 w/Manfrotto 322RC2 ballhead, Lowepro Nova 2 AW
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
- Mods Database • The team • Delete all board cookies • Reset blocks • All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]
