first photo posting

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

first photo posting

Postby rookie2 on Thu Nov 10, 2005 12:47 am

late at night and against my better judgemnent this is my first photo posting here - I did do one on dpreview in my first couple of weeks of owning the d70 but was not ready for the 'feedback' - such a big site and I think people assumed I had more knowledge than I had.


I took this by mistake and only discovered the errant boot once downloaded - it had come off as he was running past.

I have had lots of trouble getting sharp sports photos and am usually disappointed with the many shots I take...nothing like more and more practice tho.
what do people generally use for action sports - manual or auto focus? i used auto with footy and manual for cricket but the majority (99%) are throwaways.
thanks for looking.cheers
R2
Image
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Rookie2

http://www.DLdigital.smugmug.com
rookie2
Senior Member
 
Posts: 518
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 11:45 am
Location: Brighton SA

Postby Glen on Thu Nov 10, 2005 1:18 am

Interesting shot definitely an unusual capture, a bit small for easy viewing though we do appreciate your concern for bandwidth. Your image is 240 pixels wide, we ask people to keep any dimension under 800 pixels, maybe put this one up at 500 or 600 wide :wink:
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby Muzza22au on Thu Nov 10, 2005 1:23 am

Looks like a good capture!
But as is previously said alittle larger would be great!

Cheers

Scott
Nikon D80, Nikkor VR 80-400mm, Nikkor 18-135mm (kit lense), 90mm 2.8 macro, Tamron 2x AF TC

My Photos
Muzza22au
Member
 
Posts: 266
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:01 pm
Location: Landsdale, Perth, Western Australia 6065

Postby mudder on Thu Nov 10, 2005 9:15 am

Unexpected shots like this sometimes turn up some really cool captures...

This one looks like the owner of the boot has spat the dummy and turfed it in disgust :lol:

Yeah, DPReview can be an errr, ummm, interesting site... Now you know why most of us prefer to hang around here where it's actually friendly :)

Re; Auto or manual focus, I don;t do any sports stuff but I assume auto-focus would be able to track accurately and give you sharp shots... I assume you'd use continuous focus (as opposed to single focus)?

Cheers mate.[/list]
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Re: first photo posting

Postby BullcreekBob on Thu Nov 10, 2005 9:46 am

rookie2 wrote:what do people generally use for action sports - manual or auto focus? i used auto with footy and manual for cricket but the majority (99%) are throwaways.


I'm by no means a nexpert here, 96% of my cricket photos are throwaway and much less thrown in other sports. (Maybe cricket itself should be the throw away :) )

I've found auto focus at the cricket is fine - most of the action is about 100m away anyway but the odd time I try to capture fielder and ball on the run continuous, auto focus works best for me.

Cheers
Bob in Bull Creek
User avatar
BullcreekBob
Member
 
Posts: 444
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 1:57 pm
Location: Manning - an inner southern suburb of Perth, WA

first img posting

Postby rookie2 on Thu Nov 10, 2005 10:20 am

thanks for the feedback and tips. flickr seems to dwonsize my img even more as I uploaded it bigger than that.
will try again tonight.
will take your helpful info on board - and stay away from dpreview for posting imgs!!
cheers
R2
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Rookie2

http://www.DLdigital.smugmug.com
rookie2
Senior Member
 
Posts: 518
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 11:45 am
Location: Brighton SA

Postby cc@t on Thu Nov 10, 2005 10:53 am

Rookie - not that I am an expert but if you try the sports mode on top first it will give you a fair idea of shutter speeds/apeture sizes that you are taking and you can then play around from there. Also do you shoot in single shot or continuous burst - you use more shots, but you just might find that you capture that "perfect" shot you might have otherwise have missed. Hope that helps...
User avatar
cc@t
Member
 
Posts: 263
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 10:34 am
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Postby tarotastic on Thu Nov 10, 2005 11:13 am

I've had a lot of success with the sport mode on the D70S. In fact I think the 'S' in D70S stands for sport!! I agree with the recommendation to use continuous burst mode as well as you have a much better chance of catching that special moment. When I do high speed shots I typically take the camera out of RAW mode as the burst works a lot quicker.
D70S
tarotastic
Member
 
Posts: 174
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 9:56 am
Location: Chatswood, Sydney

Postby gecko on Thu Nov 10, 2005 11:15 am

Welcome to the forum, you will find lots of great information here and friendly souls as well.

I have tried photographing kids sports with mixed success, so I can't offer much advice. Good luck.

Cheers
Gecko
Nikon D70, SB600, Benbo Trekker, LSII, KingPano and a lot to learn!
User avatar
gecko
Member
 
Posts: 345
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2005 3:08 pm
Location: Ashgrove, Brisbane

Postby ozimax on Thu Nov 10, 2005 11:21 am

Great candid that will be remembered for a long time, I can remember seeing many cricket bats being thrown around the place...Max
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

why dont images appear larger

Postby rookie2 on Thu Nov 10, 2005 11:15 pm

thanks for all the sports photos tips. I'll be out ther again this w/e and will concentrate on using the sports mode, multi burst, AF - C and largest JPeg files instead of RAW, A/S Priprity and manual focussing - should be intersting to compare!

I am having trouble with uploading onto the flickr site - why do my images come out this small even when uploaded at higher (ie 1024 x 768) as flickr recommends but they only come up as these little images

this is one from my trusty Sony DSC V1 from a year ago in SE Asia..why does it come out so small?

any info gratefull accepted..again.
Image
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Rookie2

http://www.DLdigital.smugmug.com
rookie2
Senior Member
 
Posts: 518
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 11:45 am
Location: Brighton SA


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques