sandpiper symmetry

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

sandpiper symmetry

Postby avkomp on Sat Sep 24, 2005 6:49 pm

Image
saw these this morning and tried to form a conga line with the birds and their reflections. The best I could get was these 2.

They just wouldnt cooperate!!

Steve
Last edited by avkomp on Sun Jan 08, 2006 4:19 pm, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby kipper on Sat Sep 24, 2005 7:13 pm

Mah, the birds are here.....

Nice shot :)

Good to see some of the migratory birds are back.
Apparently it started early this year according to Nicole.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby kipper on Sat Sep 24, 2005 7:34 pm

Nicole might be able to better ID this or even Corwin on NSN.
I think it's either a White-rumped Sandpiper or Sharp-tailed Sandpiper.
The waders/waterbirds aren't my strong point :)
I want to get to know them this spring though when I get my hands on the big fella.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby DionM on Sat Sep 24, 2005 7:36 pm

Very nice shot. Like it a lot.

Canon 20D and a bunch of lovely L glass and a 580EX. Benro tripod. Manfrotto monopod. Lowepro and Crumpler bags. And a pair of Sigma teleconverters, and some Kenko tubes.
http://www.dionm.net/
DionM
Senior Member
 
Posts: 898
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:11 pm
Location: Holland Park, Brisbane

Postby avkomp on Sat Sep 24, 2005 7:49 pm

Darryl, the jury is still out on what exactly these are.

There seems to be so many different species that this could be. I have a few guides and still cant decide!! After the 24hrs thingy is up I may post it up for id.

saw heaps of stuff this morning. I got some with a royal spoon bill and egret both in full breeding plumage. tad far away though and I got blown highlights.
Wanted a good shot of the spoonbill cos it looked like a rockstar....nexttime

Steve
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby Nicole on Sat Sep 24, 2005 10:06 pm

Waders are so tricky to id. :roll:

I've got some shots of Sharp-tailed Sandpipers from Edithvale earlier this year and the beak looks different. Mine also look a bit smaller. I don't think it's a White-rumped as there have only ever been a few sightings in Aus. My other thought is Pectoral Sandpiper. That's what I'm leaning towards anyway.

Very excited it's spring. All the birds migrating back and hopefully some better weather! BTW...Nice shot. May also look at lighting this one up a touch. :D
Nicole
Web Site
Nicole
Senior Member
 
Posts: 569
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:54 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby stubbsy on Sun Sep 25, 2005 12:39 am

Steve

Problems or not, the concept and execution are pretty much spot on and the OOF bird in the background (rather than going for both in focus) works really, really well.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby PiroStitch on Sun Sep 25, 2005 12:41 am

I think the DOF is a tad bit shallow for me. Woudl have been nice to get that secondary bird a bit more focussed. Either way well spotted and I like how the reflection of the bkg bird links to the foreground bird, not as a conga line, but more like a step :)
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby avkomp on Sun Sep 25, 2005 12:58 am

I know it doesn't look like it , but the bird in the background are around 2 feet behind the closer ones, so whereas I would have liked all in focus, with the early morning light, it wasnt possible.

you get distance compression with longer lenses.

Steve
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby PiroStitch on Sun Sep 25, 2005 2:01 am

Heheh learn something new everyday :)
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby Oneputt on Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:05 am

That is an interesting shot and the bird in the foreground is very sharp. :D
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby kipper on Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:14 am

Nicole I wasn't sure about the Pectoral as the head markings on that according to Simpson and Day are quite dark. It's hard to tell without seeing size comparisons of the different breeds.

Steve, out of interest how low to the ground were you? I would of like a lower angle for waders. You really need to start eating dirt for the good shots. Check out NSN, 99% of the wader shots there are taken with the guys crawling on the ground with either a skimmer pod or a gitzo (or quiv) fully stretched out so that the legs are flat or with no pod at all and the telephoto lens foot in the mud. If you have any full length waders use these to cover up your clothes so you don't get dirty.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby Slider on Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:18 am

Nice Shot Steve. I like the DOF effect with the super sharp foreground bird and the other background bird out of focus. Very nice.
Cheers
Mark :) http://www.photographicaustralia.com
http://www.trekaboutphotography.com

He who dies with the most lenses wins...
User avatar
Slider
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld

Postby avkomp on Sun Sep 25, 2005 11:17 am

Kipper:

I was on the ground, but the water level was a way below that.

I could have got the camera lower but at the time didnt give it much thought.
would have needed to be in the water to get an eye level of these.

Steve
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby nito on Sun Sep 25, 2005 11:21 am

I think a deeper DOF would be nicer, since it would give a nice balance to the shot. Nevertheless, the shot as presented is excellent!
nito
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1109
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 11:24 am
Location: Gladesville, NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques