
saw these this morning and tried to form a conga line with the birds and their reflections. The best I could get was these 2.
They just wouldnt cooperate!!
Steve
sandpiper symmetryModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
sandpiper symmetry![]() saw these this morning and tried to form a conga line with the birds and their reflections. The best I could get was these 2. They just wouldnt cooperate!! Steve Last edited by avkomp on Sun Jan 08, 2006 4:19 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Nicole might be able to better ID this or even Corwin on NSN.
I think it's either a White-rumped Sandpiper or Sharp-tailed Sandpiper. The waders/waterbirds aren't my strong point ![]() I want to get to know them this spring though when I get my hands on the big fella. Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
Very nice shot. Like it a lot.
Canon 20D and a bunch of lovely L glass and a 580EX. Benro tripod. Manfrotto monopod. Lowepro and Crumpler bags. And a pair of Sigma teleconverters, and some Kenko tubes. http://www.dionm.net/
Darryl, the jury is still out on what exactly these are.
There seems to be so many different species that this could be. I have a few guides and still cant decide!! After the 24hrs thingy is up I may post it up for id. saw heaps of stuff this morning. I got some with a royal spoon bill and egret both in full breeding plumage. tad far away though and I got blown highlights. Wanted a good shot of the spoonbill cos it looked like a rockstar....nexttime Steve
Waders are so tricky to id.
![]() I've got some shots of Sharp-tailed Sandpipers from Edithvale earlier this year and the beak looks different. Mine also look a bit smaller. I don't think it's a White-rumped as there have only ever been a few sightings in Aus. My other thought is Pectoral Sandpiper. That's what I'm leaning towards anyway. Very excited it's spring. All the birds migrating back and hopefully some better weather! BTW...Nice shot. May also look at lighting this one up a touch. ![]() Nicole
Web Site
Steve
Problems or not, the concept and execution are pretty much spot on and the OOF bird in the background (rather than going for both in focus) works really, really well. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
I think the DOF is a tad bit shallow for me. Woudl have been nice to get that secondary bird a bit more focussed. Either way well spotted and I like how the reflection of the bkg bird links to the foreground bird, not as a conga line, but more like a step
![]() Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
I know it doesn't look like it , but the bird in the background are around 2 feet behind the closer ones, so whereas I would have liked all in focus, with the early morning light, it wasnt possible.
you get distance compression with longer lenses. Steve
That is an interesting shot and the bird in the foreground is very sharp.
![]() "The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"
D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
Nicole I wasn't sure about the Pectoral as the head markings on that according to Simpson and Day are quite dark. It's hard to tell without seeing size comparisons of the different breeds.
Steve, out of interest how low to the ground were you? I would of like a lower angle for waders. You really need to start eating dirt for the good shots. Check out NSN, 99% of the wader shots there are taken with the guys crawling on the ground with either a skimmer pod or a gitzo (or quiv) fully stretched out so that the legs are flat or with no pod at all and the telephoto lens foot in the mud. If you have any full length waders use these to cover up your clothes so you don't get dirty. Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
Nice Shot Steve. I like the DOF effect with the super sharp foreground bird and the other background bird out of focus. Very nice.
Cheers
Mark ![]() http://www.trekaboutphotography.com He who dies with the most lenses wins...
Kipper:
I was on the ground, but the water level was a way below that. I could have got the camera lower but at the time didnt give it much thought. would have needed to be in the water to get an eye level of these. Steve
Previous topic • Next topic
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|