A few flower pics (3 img)

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

A few flower pics (3 img)

Postby Aussie Dave on Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:05 pm

Was going through some photos I took a week or so ago and decided to PP these 3 images. They seemed to turn out OK, so I thought I'd post them to see what you think of them:

Image

Image

Image


Comments/critiques (good & bad) welcomed....
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby Potatis on Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:19 pm

All of them are absolutely outstanding. :D Frame them and sell them!
Doug C.
Potatis
Senior Member
 
Posts: 512
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:04 am
Location: Mosman

Postby stubbsy on Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:22 pm

Dave

They're great. What took you so long? Not enough free time :wink:
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Aussie Dave on Wed Sep 21, 2005 8:25 am

Thanks Potatis & Stubbsy. Yes, my free time is not what it used to be, but I'm managing OK :)

2 replies out of 30+ views.....I didn't think they were that bad.
Perhaps I caught everyone on a slow night :wink:

Anyone else care to share their thoughts on my 3 images above ??
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby Potatis on Wed Sep 21, 2005 8:45 am

The number of replies means nothing. They are great photos whether you get one reply or 100. :)
Doug C.
Potatis
Senior Member
 
Posts: 512
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:04 am
Location: Mosman

Postby Aussie Dave on Wed Sep 21, 2005 8:52 am

Potatis wrote:The number of replies means nothing. They are great photos whether you get one reply or 100. :)


This is very true Doug. I hope I didn't offend you ? I'd just like to read varying responses to the images, to see what others think, but this does not mean I do not value both yours and Stubbsy's comments :)
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby Alpha_7 on Wed Sep 21, 2005 10:03 am

Love the first one, and the other 2 while good are no where near the standard of the first (for me atleast). Very nicely done.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Potatis on Wed Sep 21, 2005 10:11 am

Dave, I was not offended. :) I was just reassuring you. (You worried that they might be "that bad") :) I look forward to seeing more of your future posts. Get PPing!
Doug C.
Potatis
Senior Member
 
Posts: 512
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:04 am
Location: Mosman

Postby stubbsy on Wed Sep 21, 2005 10:15 am

Dave

If you look at the reviews and critiques thread you'll see comments to views is on about a 1 to 10 ratio. Yours is a little under that. The number of views is also low, so the issue will be the black hole you posted into. I find I get more comments on posts made in the 7pm to 9 pm slot. Personally this is strange since whenever I log in I look at the "Posts since last visit" lists so the time of the post is of no consequence. Hopefully the occasional shameless bump will get your pics noticed since they are worthy of feedback. :wink:

I'll also give some more detaile critique:

#1 - a great example of cropping. Too often we see this beautiful flower with the whole flower on display which means we miss the subtle hues of the blue/purple part. With the cropping here that's ALL we see and it makes for both a different and interesting perspective on the flower.


#2 - I'd like a tad more DOF on this, but I'm greedy :wink:

#3 - no problem with the shot, but I'd rotate it clockwise 90 degrees so the bloom was top of frame (anti clockwise isn't too bad either). I think you'll find the image appears much more balanced.

Cheers
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Potatis on Wed Sep 21, 2005 10:25 am

Good call on point #3, Stubbsy. I agree. On top with the bloom works best for me.
Doug C.
Potatis
Senior Member
 
Posts: 512
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:04 am
Location: Mosman

Postby jberth1 on Wed Sep 21, 2005 3:20 pm

number 2 and 3 don't grab me, but number 1 is just like....BANG - WOW !

number 2 seems a little hot on my monitor, and number 3 makes you work too hard to find the focal point - IMHO.

In number 1.......So often Bird of Paradise look a little daggy, but this one is pristine. The tight cropping is just perfect for this shot !

Thanks

Justin
User avatar
jberth1
Member
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 5:56 pm
Location: West Pennant Hills, Sydney, NSW

Postby mic on Wed Sep 21, 2005 3:45 pm

Very very outstanding shots there Dave :D

Mic :wink:
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC

Postby mic on Wed Sep 21, 2005 3:47 pm

Sorry, thats Gung Ho Inverter Mic

Thanks Leigh Or Glen :roll:
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC

Postby mic on Wed Sep 21, 2005 3:48 pm

Now if I Invert that, is that Ho Gung :lol:

Sorry Dave :wink:
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC

Postby Aussie Dave on Wed Sep 21, 2005 9:51 pm

thank you everyone for your feedback....that is exactly what I was hoping for.

When I get some more time, I will try rotating the 3rd pic so the flower is at the top, to see how it looks (great advice, too) and I shall also take onboard all other suggestions. I really appreciate your comments and I shall endeavour to learn from them and hopefully utilise everyone's wisdom to grow this passion we all call photography

Thanks also to cim retrevni oh gnug (sorry Mic, I inverted your new name :lol: :lol: :lol: ) - I think I'm coming down with a case of invertalitis....I hope I get rid of it before the wind changes direction :wink:
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques