Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Slider on Wed Aug 17, 2005 3:52 pm
Firstly, thanks to Paul (aka NikonUser) for sharing his framing method upon which I have based this one.
This Grevillea is the first one we planted after moving in back in 1988.
Gnarly old tree but still produces great flowers.
Tamron 70-300mm Macro @ 240mm with 20mm extension tube (on tripod). 1/32s @f/5 Remote fill in flash hand held off to the side and diffused (with plastic shopping bag).
70-300mm Macro @ 200mm with 20mm extension tube (on tripod). 1/512s @ f/16 Remote flash diffused (through plastic shopping bag) hand held to the side.

-

Slider
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
- Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld
-
by sirhc55 on Wed Aug 17, 2005 3:56 pm
Mark - both shots are excellent, #1 should be hung on your wall. The Tamron is certainly showing its optic quality along with your own skills.
Chris -------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
-

sirhc55
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
by Alpha_7 on Wed Aug 17, 2005 4:09 pm
WOW!
They are gorgeous photo's, very well done I love them both.
Love the water droplets on the first, and love the detail in the second especially the "furry" bits for want of a better term.
Great shots!
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by JordanP on Wed Aug 17, 2005 4:36 pm
Sensational shots. I also particularly like the first one. I'd be framing and hanging that one if I shot it.
Very nice 
Craig
-

JordanP
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1050
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
- Location: Lismore, NSW
-
by OzzieGirl on Wed Aug 17, 2005 4:46 pm
Stunning photos. I like how the first one is focused on the ends of the flower and the water droplets add a beautiful effect to the shot.
#2 is so clear and sharp, well done.
-

OzzieGirl
- Newbie
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 6:41 pm
- Location: Melbourne
by stubbsy on Wed Aug 17, 2005 4:49 pm
Mark
Two great shots of a lovely Australian native. Thanks for sharing. (I have a tiny preference for the second shot as the bokeh on the first is a teensy weensy bit harsh for me)
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by Alpha_7 on Wed Aug 17, 2005 4:51 pm
stubbsy wrote:Mark
Two great shots of a lovely Australian native. Thanks for sharing. (I have a tiny preference for the second shot as the bokeh on the first is a teensy weensy bit harsh for me)
Stubbsy, for the uninitiated, what is this bokeh you are refering too ?
I've seen it used once or twice and am not familar with the term.
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by mitedo on Wed Aug 17, 2005 5:03 pm
Great shots Mark 
Kevin
-

mitedo
- Member
-
- Posts: 465
- Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 11:02 pm
- Location: Noosaville .
by waspo on Wed Aug 17, 2005 6:31 pm
Wow, I love these shots especially the 1st one! Great use of the flash to achieve the lighting effect on the droplets.
Well done, mate! 
-

waspo
- Member
-
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 8:46 pm
- Location: Bentleigh East, Melbourne - SuPeR NikoN D7o aBuSeR!
by christiand on Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:20 pm
wow,
those shots are "wunderbar"
CD
-

christiand
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
- Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra
by Poon on Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:21 pm
Beautiful.
Can not imagine the lens is so nice.
-------
Rgds
Poon
-

Poon
- The HK Connection
-
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 9:32 pm
- Location: Hong Kong
-
by Slider on Wed Aug 17, 2005 10:57 pm
Thanks for all the great comments folks. I was very happy with the way they turned out. Forgot to add that I also used remote for shutter release to try and minimise unwanted movement. Just out of interest the 1st shot is almost full frame and the 2nd is about a 3/4 crop. I'm pretty impressed with this Tamron lens.
Alpha_7 wrote:stubbsy wrote:Mark
Two great shots of a lovely Australian native. Thanks for sharing. (I have a tiny preference for the second shot as the bokeh on the first is a teensy weensy bit harsh for me)
Stubbsy, for the uninitiated, what is this bokeh you are refering too ? I've seen it used once or twice and am not familar with the term.
I was going to ask the same question 
-

Slider
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
- Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld
-
by Alpha_7 on Wed Aug 17, 2005 11:14 pm
Glad I'm not the only one 
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by marc on Thu Aug 18, 2005 12:11 am
Stubbsy, for the uninitiated, what is this bokeh you are refering too ?
"Bokeh" is the term used for a lens ability to render out of focus background
D4|D3S|D700+MB-D10| 14-24 |24-70|70-200 f/2.8 VRII|70-200 f/4 VR|80-400 AF-S|500VR|Sigma 150 f/2.8 macro|TC's 1.4,1.7E & 2.0III|SB 900
-

marc
- Member
-
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 10:20 pm
- Location: Laufen, Switzerland. D4, D3S, D700+MB-D10
-
by Alpha_7 on Thu Aug 18, 2005 12:17 am
Thanks,
while I'm asking , I figured OOF is Out of Focus, but what is DOF ?

-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by KerryPierce on Thu Aug 18, 2005 10:11 am
Very nice macro shots, Mark. That first one is quite striking with the highlights in the water drops. 
-

KerryPierce
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
- Location: Detroit, MI
-
by Rick on Thu Aug 18, 2005 10:23 am
Alpha-7
DOF = depth of field, the amount of the picture that is in focus.
I know that from film days, but grumpy old men like me need a dictionary of digital abreviations and meanings.
Cheers, Rick PS nice shots of the flowers.
-
Rick
- Member
-
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 9:02 pm
- Location: Castle Hill, Sydney
by paulvdb1 on Thu Aug 18, 2005 4:33 pm
I definitely like the first shot more than second. #2's a great shot but #1 is really unusual, having just the tips of the flower and the drops in focus - very interesting.
-
paulvdb1
- Member
-
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:22 pm
- Location: NW Sydney
by Geoff on Thu Aug 18, 2005 4:38 pm
Sensational - sell shot #1 - it is worthy!
-

Geoff
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 7791
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
- Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.
-
by robboh on Thu Aug 18, 2005 10:17 pm
Slider. These are awesome.
I do agree with Stubbsy about the bokeh in the first one, though I honestly didnt notice it much in the first viewing. Is is possibly something that you can tune out a little in PP??
Smile; it makes people wonder what you have been up to.
-

robboh
- Member
-
- Posts: 455
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 7:50 pm
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
-
by vrboy on Thu Aug 18, 2005 10:54 pm
The second shot is unreallll!!!!
it almost has a metallic feel to the reds, I love it.
C
-
vrboy
- Member
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 12:18 am
- Location: Brisbane QLd
-
by Slider on Fri Aug 19, 2005 11:33 pm
Thanks again for the great feedback folks.
Here is a slightly altered version with the background blurred to reduce the impact of the lens bokeh.
Not sure. I think I am still leaning towards the original.
And I am reliably informed by the Boss that it is a Grevillea Banksii for those who may be interested.

-

Slider
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
- Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld
-
by sirhc55 on Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:49 am
Mark - you are right the first image is certainly better with the bokeh as is 
Chris -------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
-

sirhc55
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|