DSLRUsers.com

Along with a 70-200 1:28 GII ED.

Just going from memory, because I don't have the Mk IV here, but the D3s body feels a lot heavier than that of the Mk 4.

I don't have a CF card with me right now, but just shooting at ISO settings of H1 and H3 ... hmmmm ....

Sounds like a man sized camera

Where are the ISO 104200 samples? With live view on, this could be used for night vision?

Ha Ha who thought I would do that???
these shot of my new mum 102400 isi with the 24-70f2.8
lounge lighting--very poor
and a VERY tight crop to show noise



Cheers Jim I think its OK??

Looks pretty darn good to me!!

Damn that looks printable at 6X4!!

Can't wait for this technology to filter through to the consumer cameras!

Thanks for the pics inmotion. Unusual subject matter as well.

surenj wrote:Damn that looks printable at 6X4!!

Can't wait for this technology to filter through to the consumer cameras!

yeah...already checked the price of a D3s..ain't gonna happen this century.

Its great to see Nikon ahead at the Top end of Town. But i need them to step up at the Lower - mid end of things. Canon is ahead at the moment. Come on Nikon get your ass moving.

D3s body feels a lot heavier

this body with the 70-200 made my arms tired in about....2 minutes...

fat camera needs a diet..

If I could just have that sensor in a D700 body thanks. To go.

In fact, if we could just have Thom Hogan's modular DSLR, that'd be choice!