DSLRUsers.com

Posted: **Wed Nov 02, 2005 10:40 am**

Not my image but appropriate for people living in Sydneys North and North West...

Epping Road:

CLOSED

story here

photo by lomokev http://www.flickr.com/photos/lomokev/

Posted: **Wed Nov 02, 2005 11:36 am**

Umm... while I like the image, do you have permission from it's creator / owner to post it here?

Posted: **Wed Nov 02, 2005 11:44 am**

...the way I read it a long as I give him full credit...

Posted: **Wed Nov 02, 2005 11:51 am**

ozczecho wrote:...the way I read it a long as I give him full credit...

That's a nice intention but you still have to have copyright to post an image on this forum.

Posting a link to an image, I don't have a problem with. If you were to post the link and say how great the images are and how much you liked the "Closed" sign one then, fine.

But our FAQ has a section on this, regardless.

Posted: **Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:04 pm**

The famous Faq

Sorry.

I will edit my original post....and make a mental note "...read the faq..."

Posted: **Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:05 pm**

Cheers.

I've begun to really wonder what people think of our FAQ and I doubt it really is a bunch of Frequently Asked Questions but rather a bunch of Fucking Annoying Queries.

Unfortunately, such is life for a forum these days.

Oh well, back on topic.

Nice pictures there!

Posted: **Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:09 pm**

Usage is detailed here

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/

Licence wrote:Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0

You are free:

to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work
Under the following conditions:

Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
Noncommercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
No Derivative Works. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.

For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work.
Any of these conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder.
Your fair use and other rights are in no way affected by the above.

Posted: **Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:09 pm**

Whats a FAQ?

Posted: **Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:12 pm**

Greg B wrote:Usage is detailed here

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/

Licence wrote:Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0

You are free:

to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work
Under the following conditions:

Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
Noncommercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
No Derivative Works. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.

For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work.
Any of these conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder.
Your fair use and other rights are in no way affected by the above.

GregB..thats what I read...BUT I didnt read the forum Faq and for that I apologise. :oops:

Posted: **Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:18 pm**

Greg,

I think that this one (in bold) is of interest in this instance:

Greg B wrote:Usage is detailed here

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/

Licence wrote:Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0

You are free:

to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work
Under the following conditions:

Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
Noncommercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
No Derivative Works. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.

For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work.
Any of these conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder.
Your fair use and other rights are in no way affected by the above.

I read that as saying that we would need to publish their rules within any such posting here.

That said, the direct posting was still not in compliance with our rules here, which I feel do take a little bit of precedence, and I thank ozczecho for his prompt attention to and correction of this issue.

Posted: **Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:24 pm**

Ozczecho, it sure caused havoc around this area today didn't it. I blame Joe Tripodi and Carl Scully!! For anything!

Posted: **Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:27 pm**

Glen wrote:Ozczecho, it sure caused havoc around this area today didn't it. I blame Joe Tripodi and Carl Scully!! For anything!

Joe Tripodi? :shock:

My mate

I have heaps of his portrait photos in my file which was taken back few months at few events, and Carl too! should we have them hang? :lol:

Posted: **Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:32 pm**

Hang those bastards from the highest yardarm who sold out the people of NSW. Do it twice for the desalination plant we dont require which Scully is organising so we can all pay more for water and wreck the enviroment.

These are personal opinions, not necessarily the opinions of the board :wink:

Posted: **Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:34 pm**

I'm happy!!!!!! to see them hang!!!!!!!!!! :wink:

Posted: **Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:38 pm**

Birddog114 wrote:
Glen wrote:Ozczecho, it sure caused havoc around this area today didn't it. I blame Joe Tripodi and Carl Scully!! For anything!

Joe Tripodi? My mate
I have heaps of his portrait photos in my file which was taken back few months at few events, and Carl too! should we have them hang?

Please ????

Posted: **Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:39 pm**

Glen wrote:Hang those bastards from the highest yardarm who sold out the people of NSW. Do it twice for the desalination plant we dont require which Scully is organising so we can all pay more for water and wreck the enviroment.

These are personal opinions, not necessarily the opinions of the board

Couldnt agree more...roads, planning and infrastructure have gone to the dogs. The desalination plant is just the latest in a run of expensive disasters....

Posted: **Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:46 pm**

You wonder what they wasted all that $1billion in extra property stamp duty on they made each year for the last two years? And still I have to pay to drive to my mate Birddy's place!! Obviously NSW Government cars don't pay (or the blokes inside don't). I better not get started on how our last Premier doesn't drive. I don't trust an aussie male over 18 without a licence, how would he have picked up girls? You need a licence in NSW because there is bugger all public transport.

Posted: **Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:16 pm**

Glen wrote: I don't trust an aussie male over 18 without a licence,

Or kids.

And Bob The Builder has even less sporting interest than I do.

Atr least he can read, and speaks as if he's intelligent though, which is more than we can say for some of the other rabble in Macquarie St and Canberra.

Posted: **Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:19 pm**

Bob also now is on 1/2 mil a year from Macbank, who just happens to be one of the largest owners of infrastructure (roads) etc in the world and especially this state. Seems coincidental. That must be why I pay to drive anywhere!

Posted: **Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:28 pm**

Bob and his mates have done well in selling NSW. By 2007 we will be paying for more then just roads....

Posted: **Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:45 pm**

Roads, water, etc. When I retire I wont be able to afford to live here, seriously. I know of a one man earthmoving contractor who regularly spends over $100 a day in tolls. Hard to pass that on to your clients. Imagine the conversation, " Hi client, the job was $4k, took a week, plus $500 for tolls!"

Posted: **Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:53 pm**

That made me planned to move up to Boat Harbour once that day reachs me :wink:

Posted: **Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:54 pm**

Good move Birdy, no tolls at BH

Posted: **Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:58 pm**

Glen wrote:Good move Birdy, no tolls at BH

Not yet...

Posted: **Wed Nov 02, 2005 2:08 pm**

Paul, no holes either. Hope you can get home tonight without too much hassle