How can I improve this shot for future reference

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

How can I improve this shot for future reference

Postby Dougie on Fri Jul 29, 2005 3:03 pm

This is a shot taken at Champagne Pools on Fraser Island. Just had time to pick up the camera and fire. Luckily the camera was set up to go. How could I have improved the shot if I'd had the time to compose it?
Doug :D

Image
Last edited by Dougie on Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
As soon as you make something idiot proof they build a better idiot.
Dougie
Member
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 10:27 am
Location: Gladstone Qld

Postby owen on Fri Jul 29, 2005 3:15 pm

Hi doug. I would possibly get some of those rocks nice and close in the foreground... but it's a great capture, very impressive. Perhaps you can increase the saturation of the water a bit, and add a bit of contrast.
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Postby phillipb on Fri Jul 29, 2005 3:24 pm

owen wrote:Hi doug. I would possibly get some of those rocks nice and close in the foreground... but it's a great capture, very impressive. Perhaps you can increase the saturation of the water a bit, and add a bit of contrast.

After having done that, you could have put it in the current competition :lol:
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby Dougie on Fri Jul 29, 2005 3:28 pm

Thanks Owen,
Absolutley no Idea how to increase sat etc, have only had PS for 2 weeks and just learning how to post process, and any assistance would be appreciated. Phillip what comp are you referring to.
Doug
As soon as you make something idiot proof they build a better idiot.
Dougie
Member
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 10:27 am
Location: Gladstone Qld

Postby phillipb on Fri Jul 29, 2005 3:35 pm

Doug, I was referring to the competition that has just closed (See the front page in this forum).
As for the photo, I use photoshop to adjust things such as contrast, saturation etc.
Here is an example of your photo.
Image

Oops. I just realised that the front page has changed.
Try this link for the comp. http://www.potofgrass.com/gallery/challenge5
Last edited by phillipb on Fri Jul 29, 2005 5:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby owen on Fri Jul 29, 2005 3:36 pm

Hi Doug.

In PS, go to (just going from memory here, I'm probably very wrong.) Image - Adjust - saturation. You'll get a box with two sliders in it, one for contrast and one for saturation. The key with saturation is you don't want to make it look too fake, just enhance the natural colours. And adjust the contrast so that the image looks good to you.

Cheers,
Owen.
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Postby Killakoala on Fri Jul 29, 2005 4:56 pm

That is one freaky looking wave. I've seen a few waves in my time but never one like that. Amazing. As far as the capture goes, i think the image is great. The two kids in the picture, totally oblivious to the wave, really add something to it.

Well done...
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby Dougie on Fri Jul 29, 2005 9:37 pm

Thanks Phillip/Owen will give it a try, the processed shot looks great. Thanks all for your comments
Doug
As soon as you make something idiot proof they build a better idiot.
Dougie
Member
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 10:27 am
Location: Gladstone Qld

Postby krpolak on Fri Jul 29, 2005 10:05 pm

--> Dougie

What about that:

Image

1. Cropping, you don't need to see more than that. This put your attention to relation between wave and boys. Also note, that hiding some parts of the wave force your mind to use imagination - wave looks bigger ;-) Also small crop from the bottom, cuts shallow water so it is not that obvious that is shallow ;-)

2. Darkening the sky. It start to be more dramatic and suporting for the situaction as well as...

3. ... giving better tonal contrast for the wave. Setting up level for the wave applies as well. Point is to get nice, white foam and better water colour.

4. A bit more saturation for yellows, will pop up rocks and boys

Extra comment here. You have good reflex and it is difficult to get that king of shot but, I recon your DOF selection was a bit unfortunate. Now second plan is blury whereas third is sharp. I would rather go to possible ways:

1. Increase DOF, so everyting in interest area is sharp

2. Or realy decrease with focusing on boys. Possibly close up could work as well.

Well, just suggetion. It is not easy to get good wave :)

That is all.

Regards,

K.Polak
User avatar
krpolak
Member
 
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 5:07 pm
Location: North Sydney

Postby storm on Sat Jul 30, 2005 5:10 am

amazing capture.
-"It's amazing how the everyday can become unique through a lens and an open mind."

http://gallery.netmagi.com/tomstorm
User avatar
storm
Member
 
Posts: 67
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:31 am
Location: Jim Thorpe, PA USA

Postby KerryPierce on Sat Jul 30, 2005 11:22 am

Excellent base photo, Dougie. The others have already given you good advice on how to finish it. :D
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby sirhc55 on Sat Jul 30, 2005 11:53 am

Doug - it’s always the same. The decisive moment comp finishes and you capture an excellent contender - well done :D
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Andoru on Sat Jul 30, 2005 3:30 pm

I like the wide-angle shot better. Great timing!

Imagine this photo being taken in last December - people would have thought that you've captured the start of the tsunami hitting the beach or something.

I really like how the water looks like a sheet of ice! Very original look I think. Don't recall seeing waves looking like ice that's for sure.

So what happened in the aftermath? Did the kids get drenched? :twisted:
User avatar
Andoru
Member
 
Posts: 195
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 3:10 am
Location: Sydney

Postby leek on Sun Jul 31, 2005 8:49 am

A very strange looking wave... Nice capture...

I prefer the more saturated versions and Krystian's would have been better than phillipb's if he hadn't cropped it... :-) Personally, I think that the continuation of the wave off to the left adds to the imagery...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby nito on Sun Jul 31, 2005 9:51 am

I agree with krpolak and phillipb. The original image looked flat, adding more saturation brings it to life. Krpolak cropping suggestion is good and does draw the attention to the boys and the wave.

Overall I thought it was a good shot and with a bit of post-processing it will be a great shot! Well done.
nito
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1109
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 11:24 am
Location: Gladesville, NSW

Postby Dougie on Thu Aug 04, 2005 10:24 pm

Thank you everybody for the advice. Have not had a chance to play with the shot, but I love both Phillips and Kristians versions. The impact of Kristians and the fulll story of Phillips. I really have to learn how to use photoshop now.
Now, what happened to the boys - they just got a bit wet. The wave actually broke on the rocks about 10m behind them. Sorry nothing dramatic to report on that story.
again thanks all
Doug
:D
As soon as you make something idiot proof they build a better idiot.
Dougie
Member
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 10:27 am
Location: Gladstone Qld


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques