Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by SoCal Steve on Tue May 10, 2005 6:41 pm
Hard work pays off in the future. Laziness pays off now.
-

SoCal Steve
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 6:25 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
by pippin88 on Tue May 10, 2005 6:49 pm
All great shots, but especially the first one.
-

pippin88
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1107
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 6:42 pm
- Location: Newcastle / Sydney
by SoCal Steve on Wed May 11, 2005 5:26 pm
Hoping that maybe I can get a few more replies and critiques on these pictures besides the one last evening.
 So, stand up at your computer, grab some tomatos and throw 'em at me! 
Hard work pays off in the future. Laziness pays off now.
-

SoCal Steve
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 6:25 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
by stubbsy on Wed May 11, 2005 5:52 pm
Steve
First one I like the best. DOF excellent and the colour contrast between the stamen & rest of flower really imcreases the impact.
#2 I also like. Nice & sharp & good colours
#3 doesn't grab me. The yellow all blurs together - the whole image seems a little soft
#4 is technically fine, but as an image is a little boring - would have been better if all the flowers on the stem were there, rather than just some open.
I'll go pack away my tomatoes now 
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by SoCal Steve on Wed May 11, 2005 6:06 pm
stubbsy wrote:Steve
sic... #3 doesn't grab me. The yellow all blurs together - the whole image seems a little soft
#4 is technically fine, but as an image is a little boring - would have been better if all the flowers on the stem were there, rather than just some open.
Thanks, Stubbsy - I have to agree on #4. I was so taken with its strangeness that I overlooked that it was damaged when I shot it.
I will however disagree objectively with number three. You can actually see the slightly grainy texture in the petal and the brown pattern looks like it was dusted with cinnamon and a little spider climbing inside. Subjectively, if you find it boring, then it's boring. Case closed.
I really appreciated your comments, Stubbsy. Thanks for them. 
Hard work pays off in the future. Laziness pays off now.
-

SoCal Steve
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 6:25 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
by stubbsy on Wed May 11, 2005 6:56 pm
SoCal Steve wrote:stubbsy wrote:Steve
sic... #3 doesn't grab me. The yellow all blurs together - the whole image seems a little soft
#4 is technically fine, but as an image is a little boring - would have been better if all the flowers on the stem were there, rather than just some open.
Thanks, Stubbsy - I have to agree on #4. I was so taken with its strangeness that I overlooked that it was damaged when I shot it. I will however disagree objectively with number three. You can actually see the slightly grainy texture in the petal and the brown pattern looks like it was dusted with cinnamon and a little spider climbing inside. Subjectively, if you find it boring, then it's boring. Case closed. I really appreciated your comments, Stubbsy. Thanks for them. 
Steve
Boring was probably a poor use of words for #4. I guess what I was saying was it lacked punch because of the arrangement of the flowers. Apologies if you took offence as that was not my intent.
So far as #3. I'm now at home and this shot looks better on both my LCD and my CRT (which are calibrated). Maybe I need to take my Spyder to work. On these monitors the foreground petal is distinct from the background one (and I can see the 'cinnamon').
Can I have one tomato back 
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by leek on Wed May 11, 2005 7:04 pm
Nice shots Steve... I particularly like #1. What was the EXIF on that???
Also it's nice to see some species that we don't necessarily have down here...
-

leek
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3135
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
- Location: Lane Cove, Sydney
-
by SoCal Steve on Wed May 11, 2005 8:15 pm
leek wrote:Nice shots Steve... I particularly like #1. What was the EXIF on that???
Thanks for asking, Leek. The Hibiscus in #1 was shot with my Nikkor 105mm micro with an SB-800 held up and off to the side on an SC-29 cord. F/32 @ 1/250. Judging from the other pictures in the series it was probably shot indoors.
Hard work pays off in the future. Laziness pays off now.
-

SoCal Steve
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 6:25 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
by leek on Wed May 11, 2005 8:30 pm
SoCal Steve wrote:leek wrote:Nice shots Steve... I particularly like #1. What was the EXIF on that???
Thanks for asking, Leek. The Hibiscus in #1 was shot with my Nikkor 105mm micro with an SB-800 held up and off to the side on an SC-29 cord. F/32 @ 1/250. Judging from the other pictures in the series it was probably shot indoors.
OK... I now want an SC-29 cord...
Birddog??? do you have them??? how much???
-

leek
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3135
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
- Location: Lane Cove, Sydney
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|