
caught in a daze...Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: caught in a daze...The blown highlights detracts from the shot a little for me, but I imagine it wouldn't really be avoidable here.
Wonder how this would look with the whole '2 shots combined with layers' trick. One exposed like this, and one uderexposed to pick up detail in the water. Not that you can go back and do that now. . . so I'll just shut up ![]() -rich
I dunno what the fuss is about blown highlights at times. Your eyes see blown highlights all the time. If the sun was in another location if wouldn't of probably created a backlight effect, with the subject matter silhouetted.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
Kipper is so right Dee - without the highlights in this photo it would not have the impact that it does - I like
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Another great photo Dee... Where was it taken???
It looks like the Greek islands, but I'm sure it's not... Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
Dee
I always make a point of checking out your pics because they are so different to many I see. This one is no exception. A fantastic example of why we shouldn't obsess about blown highlights all the time (same goes for straight horizons ![]() Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
dunno why, but it still detracts for me. . .
The burst behind the column is perfect but I can't help thinking the water would look better with more detail (but still very bright) That said, I still REALLY like the shot, and your work is several bars ahead of where I'll likely ever be, so please don't take me seriously ![]() -Rich
Wow, really like this Dee... You have a very good eye, I always enjoy viewing your posts... While the highlights don't worry me, I could understand why the highlights in the water might for some...
Aka Andrew
thanks for all the comments...
i agree that the water highlights are a bith much.... was hard with such bright reflections off the ocean
I also sometimes don't understand why lots of people are worried about blown highlights. It really depends on the picture. I mean, if you have a huge ball of fire, like the sun in it, there isn't much you an do. I mean in this picture, he even shot the sun behind those pillars.
As for this picture, if doesn't distract me at all. I think it adds to the picture and the scenery. This picture is a very nice one, very consistent with flipfrog's style. Another great capture!! Johnny
D200, D70, 18-70mm, 85mm 1.8, 50mm 1.8, 24-120mm VR, 12-24mm Tokina, 70-300mm Tamron, Lens Baby 2.0, Peleng Fisheye 8mm, SB800, Alien Bees Studio Setup: 1 B400, 2 B800, 1 B1600, Sekonic L-358 http://www.jtimagesonline.com
I agree. The brightness on the RHS is balanced by the bloke leaning against the pillar on the LHS. The overall balance of the image is excellent. I really like this pic.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|