Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Bob G on Thu Aug 06, 2009 10:15 pm
I have had tonight diaried for about a month since we shot the SS Dicky at Moonrise. Went scouting with Oneputt this afternoon and plans were for Craig VTR, Oneputt and I to shoot the moonrise which was due 10 mins. after sunset. So compasses in hand we looked for a spot for moonrise at 107degrees azimuth and some kind of foreground interest. All good plans went astray for Oneputt and Craig VTR so set off with my wife and fulfilled the objective Here's one of the shots. Comments please. 
Bob
"Wake up and smell the pixels!"
-

Bob G
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 1:52 am
- Location: Mooloolaba, Sunshine Coast, Qld.
-
by ian.bertram on Thu Aug 06, 2009 10:25 pm
WOW- that may not be terribly critical or helpful, but what a gorgeous image- the colours are so soothing, the velvet ocean is mesmerising- what a stunner. Maybe the sand bottom right is a slight distraction- what do others think?
-

ian.bertram
- Member
-
- Posts: 188
- Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 7:35 pm
- Location: Panania, South Western Sydney, NSW
-
by aim54x on Thu Aug 06, 2009 11:09 pm
This is amazing...very magical! how long was the exposure?
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by colin_12 on Thu Aug 06, 2009 11:20 pm
I would like to see a version with the moon toned down just a tad. The colouration around the dge is also a little odd looking. I find the rest of the image just lovely to behold.
Regards Colin Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
-

colin_12
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
- Location: Hazelbrook
by Murray Foote on Thu Aug 06, 2009 11:25 pm
It's not possible. This is a moonlight shot and the correct exposure for the moon itself is the same as daytime midday.
(Edit) - I suppose I should add the caveat - It's not possible unless you combine two images or perhaps have an HDR covering more than 20 stops.
-

Murray Foote
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1291
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 1:31 pm
- Location: Ainslie, Canberra
by Murray Foote on Thu Aug 06, 2009 11:34 pm
I don't mind the shadow at the bottom right. I just wonder why the bottom part of the image is so much brighter - artificial light from the shore colour corrected back to standard daylight? I wonder whether it might work better with a slower gradation.
(Note to people who haven't done this sort of exposure - there is no colour caste with moonlight, it's just reflected light from the sun. We see it as blue due to the way the rods and cones in our eyes operate).
Regards, Murray
-

Murray Foote
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1291
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 1:31 pm
- Location: Ainslie, Canberra
by Murray Foote on Thu Aug 06, 2009 11:40 pm
aim54x wrote:This is amazing...very magical! how long was the exposure?
It can't be very long because the moon hasn't moved much. I think it's moved a little. My guess would be 30 seconds.
-

Murray Foote
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1291
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 1:31 pm
- Location: Ainslie, Canberra
by Bob G on Fri Aug 07, 2009 10:48 am
Model: NIKON D3 Lens (mm): 102 ISO: 800 Aperture: 11 Shutter: 6 Exp. Comp.: -1.5
Bob
"Wake up and smell the pixels!"
-

Bob G
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 1:52 am
- Location: Mooloolaba, Sunshine Coast, Qld.
-
by norwest on Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:21 am
Well exposed, composed and moody. Very nice shot.
-
norwest
- Member
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 3:12 pm
- Location: Namoi Valley North West NSW
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|