DSLRUsers.com

Posted: **Wed Dec 07, 2005 4:46 am**

Who can tell me how this is digitally edited? I will give one clue! I have altered 1 person 2 x in the photo!!! And they are fairly major alterations in my mind... Plus how does the photo look? C&C welcome!!!

Cheers

Scott

The original!!!

Posted: **Wed Dec 07, 2005 7:37 am**

I would say the guy on the left, you've flipped his head as he was originally looking to the right?

Posted: **Wed Dec 07, 2005 9:18 am**

I think that Owen's spot on.

There's still some of the sky left in the area adjacent to his hair whee it intersects with the building's roof, on the rh side as we view the image.

Reasonably well done however, but this image still needs some serious curves work, btw.

Posted: **Wed Dec 07, 2005 1:11 pm**

owen wrote:I would say the guy on the left, you've flipped his head as he was originally looking to the right?

Very good! Yeah I will have to finish it off alittle better and as said do more work with curves...

Cheers

Scott

Posted: **Wed Dec 07, 2005 1:16 pm**

The hand on the shoulder, I don't think it belongs to the guy in the red shirt. Apart from looking a tad over sized in relation to his body AND in the wrong position in relation to his shoulder, it's also got a blue sleeve.

Posted: **Wed Dec 07, 2005 1:20 pm**

myarhidia wrote:The hand on the shoulder, I don't think it belongs to the guy in the red shirt. Apart from looking a tad over sized in relation to his body AND in the wrong position in relation to his shoulder, it's also got a blue sleeve.

It actually does belong there, I think the blue sleeve that you are seeing is his watch.

Posted: **Wed Dec 07, 2005 1:22 pm**

myarhidia wrote:The hand on the shoulder, I don't think it belongs to the guy in the red shirt. Apart from looking a tad over sized in relation to his body AND in the wrong position in relation to his shoulder, it's also got a blue sleeve.

I think the blue sleeve is actually a wrist watch...

Posted: **Wed Dec 07, 2005 1:23 pm**

LOL a watch, I guess that's what you get when you use a crappy monitor.

Posted: **Wed Dec 07, 2005 1:30 pm**

I must admit that the hand on the shoulder is very odd. The guy it is supposed to belong to has his shoulder going down which, perspectively, would mean that his arm must be ultra long.

Just seen the original and now know why the hand looked odd. The shoulder in the original is obviously at the right angle for the hand.

Posted: **Wed Dec 07, 2005 1:35 pm**

sirhc55 wrote:I must admit that the hand on the shoulder is very odd. The guy it is supposed to belong to has his shoulder going down which, perspectively, would mean that his arm must be ultra long.

Just seen the original and now know why the hand looked odd. The shoulder in the original is obviously at the right angle for the hand.

Thats another thing I am going to have to fix aswell. Well back to the drawing board...

Posted: **Wed Dec 07, 2005 2:07 pm**

The hand on the shoulder threw me off too.

DSLRUsers.com

Digitally edited?

Digitally edited?