


Monochrome experimentsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Monochrome experimentsInspired by Leigh two experiments in monochrome. I just can't make myself blow those damn highlights
![]() ![]() ![]() Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Peter - I like the tyre tracks - but, why worry about blown highlights at all - they exist
![]() On the scale of 0-255 one goes from black to white so there is always the possibility of pure white and black ![]() Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Peter to be honest your tyre tracks don't work for me. However I like the long line hooks, all together they look very fibrous, like animal hair or fur.
I agree with Chris, in the old film days, a B&W photo wasn't considered to be any good unless it had pure black, pure white and every shade in between.
Unless of course if the blown highlights are meant to have some important details. __________
Phillip **Nikon D7000**
Hi Peter,
It is great to see that you are experimenting. The tracks have a lot of potential. The fishing hooks are very contrasty; I believe. Keep doing that work; I love to see more of it. Regards, CD
Chris, Craig, Phillip, Doug and Christian. Thank you all for your comments. You have emboldened me to have another go at this.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Peter
The tyre tracks is one of those rare images that lacks inspiration...until you enlarge it! Then it come to life with a beauty of its own. And technically very nice too. Digital can do black and white just fine. Your second image has beautiful tones and is compositionally perfect...but I'm damned if I know what the subject matter is? So it's an abstract to me and that's just fine. Regards
Matt. K
Phillip, The difference being that both the pure white, and the pure black, were supposed to be contained within some area of the image, within the detail, rather than, say, a blown highlight, like, for instance, a reflection of light from a glass or mirror. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Thanks for the comments Matt. The second image is hundreds of fish hooks on a single line. This was taken on a long line tuna fishing boat that was in port readying for an expedition. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|