Exposure critiques wanted.

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Exposure critiques wanted.

Postby Potatis on Sat Oct 22, 2005 6:29 pm

I'm going mad trying get my exposure settings right. A photo of mine that I viewed on Birddog's computer today looked brighter than on my own computer. After fiddling with my monitor settings I've become a bit lost. I know I need to properly calibrate my monitor soon with something like Spyder.

I hope that the highlights, brightness & contrast in this image are in check. On my monitor the grain in the sky is not very noticable, but would appreciate any comments from people do see it clearly.

Thanks,

Doug


Image
Doug C.
Potatis
Senior Member
 
Posts: 512
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:04 am
Location: Mosman

Postby frink on Sat Oct 22, 2005 6:38 pm

Contrast and highlights look fine to me. On my crt the grain is noticeable but not detrimental. On my lcd it starts to become detrimental, moreso because of JPG compression artifacts.
Really highlights the difference between viewing on CRT and viewing on LCD.
Still a nice photo though :)
Stephen
User avatar
frink
Newbie
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 2:47 pm
Location: Adelaide, paradise

Postby Potatis on Sat Oct 22, 2005 6:48 pm

Thanks for that Stephen. Some of the grain is JPG artifacts, but most is genuine grain. I can only just see it on my monitor, so I'm thinking my monitor is too dark. On Genista's (my fiancees) LCD monitor I can't see the grain, the sky actually looks better than on my own CRT monitor. The image on her monitor is much brighter and has less contrast.

Ok, no more PPing until I get Spyder! I know after I calibrate my monitor it will still look different on everyone else's monitor anyway though. But I must do it, because I have lost confidence in the colours I am looking at on my monitor too, not just the brightness/contrast.
Doug C.
Potatis
Senior Member
 
Posts: 512
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:04 am
Location: Mosman

Postby Killakoala on Sat Oct 22, 2005 6:59 pm

You must have a better monitor than mine. I can only see half the bridge. :)

On a more serious note, i can barely see any grain and then only when i squint and look very very closely at the screen.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby Potatis on Sat Oct 22, 2005 7:06 pm

Killakoala wrote:On a more serious note, i can barely see any grain and then only when i squint and look very very closely at the screen.


Oh no! You need to calibrate your monitor too! :lol:

Thanks for the feedback Steve. I've taken note. :)
Doug C.
Potatis
Senior Member
 
Posts: 512
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:04 am
Location: Mosman

Postby stubbsy on Sat Oct 22, 2005 7:22 pm

Doug

My CRT is calibrated and it looks fine on it. If I move the image to my LCD (which is brighter) I can see the noise, but I'd expect that. I don't see any problems with the PP on the image and think, more importantly, it would print fine (with no apparent grain in the sky).
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Potatis on Sat Oct 22, 2005 7:39 pm

Thanks for that, Peter. I remember you told me that your monitor is calibrated. I feel somewhat better now. 8)
Doug C.
Potatis
Senior Member
 
Posts: 512
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:04 am
Location: Mosman

Postby leek on Sat Oct 22, 2005 7:41 pm

frink wrote:Contrast and highlights look fine to me. On my crt the grain is noticeable but not detrimental. On my lcd it starts to become detrimental, moreso because of JPG compression artifacts.
Really highlights the difference between viewing on CRT and viewing on LCD.
Still a nice photo though :)


Exactly the same on my screens (LCD & CRT)... Brightness looks fine...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby big pix on Sat Oct 22, 2005 7:47 pm

Your image on my 20 inch calibrated mac screen looks fine........ you can see noise if you look real hard and increase the brightness......as peter said, it should print fine.........
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby sirhc55 on Sat Oct 22, 2005 8:20 pm

Doug - you are more than welcome to borrow my Spyder to calibrate your monitor - I am in Neutral Bay :D
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby mudder on Sat Oct 22, 2005 9:03 pm

Looks fine on my uncalibrated CRT, highlights look good, but I always have trouble knowing exactly what my images will print out like... Will have to calibrate my screen eventually...
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby Potatis on Sun Oct 23, 2005 12:02 am

Thanks for the feedback everyone, I really appreciate all of the comments very much! It seems my monitor isn't too far off afterall. Having said that, I'd like to take you up on your offer sirhc55. :D

Doug
Doug C.
Potatis
Senior Member
 
Posts: 512
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:04 am
Location: Mosman

Postby gstark on Sun Oct 23, 2005 8:55 am

Looks fine to me on my calibrated LCD.

Steve, the other half of the bridge has fallen off and is now at the bottom of the harbour.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Killakoala on Sun Oct 23, 2005 9:02 am

gstark wrote:
Steve, the other half of the bridge has fallen off and is now at the bottom of the harbour.


OH NO, how will i ever get to work now :) The tunnel?????
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby gstark on Sun Oct 23, 2005 9:09 am

Killakoala wrote:
gstark wrote:
Steve, the other half of the bridge has fallen off and is now at the bottom of the harbour.


OH NO, how will i ever get to work now :) The tunnel?????


And a very long straw. :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques