Seen Better Days

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Seen Better Days

Postby Frankenstein on Thu Oct 20, 2005 8:02 pm

Saw this rundown barn on a drive through the NSW Southern Highlands a few weeks ago.

Image


I think the monochrome version gives a nostalgic feel to the image.

Image

Frank
My photo gallery: http://www.frankalvaro.net
>>>> Nikon D300...Nikon 18-200 VR...Sigma 10-20...Tamron 90mm macro <<<<
"I've got an idea--an idea so smart that my head would explode if I even began to know what I'm talking about. " Peter Griffin
User avatar
Frankenstein
Senior Member
 
Posts: 504
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 12:23 pm
Location: Ruse (Sydney)

Postby marcotrov on Thu Oct 20, 2005 8:06 pm

Both have a pleasing feel to them but i like #2 B&W. Nice mood to it. I just wonder what it would be like done in Sepia through a quick PP filter process? Nice image frank.
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby PiroStitch on Thu Oct 20, 2005 8:07 pm

I like the b&w treatment to it...definitely gives it an airy fairy nostalgic field to it :) That barn's definitely seen better days.

Another alternative (my usual preference) no softness, b&w and play on the tones and addition of noise....but that's just me :)
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Nicely done

Postby BullcreekBob on Thu Oct 20, 2005 8:11 pm

G'day and congratulations on the shot.

I prefer the B & W version. What steps were involved in the conversion? I would like to try doing something similar but I'm one of those folks who finds it easier to be shown or told how to do things the first time. After that I'm usually happy to experiment.
User avatar
BullcreekBob
Member
 
Posts: 444
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 1:57 pm
Location: Manning - an inner southern suburb of Perth, WA

Postby E1Shane on Thu Oct 20, 2005 8:14 pm

I like the B&W version, but would burn/dodge (never sure which is which) that highlight where the driveways is on the right hand side near the fence post
Cheers
Shane
Olympus E1
User avatar
E1Shane
Member
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 7:27 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby mudder on Thu Oct 20, 2005 8:39 pm

G'day Frank,
Prefer the B&W especially suits an image of an old run-down shed like that, I think it's a good example of the different feel the B&W treatment can give an image...
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby Frankenstein on Thu Oct 20, 2005 8:44 pm

Thanks for everyone'e comments.

Marco, I did a sepia version but as I'm not a big fan of sepia I didn't bother posting it...but here it is anyway:

Image

Bullcreekbob - both the monochrome and sepia were converted using the OptikVerve Lab's "Virtual Photographer" filter plugin ( a freebie, but I forget where from...there's a thread on this site if you're interested).

Shane - I agree a bit of burn/dodge (I get confused too) in the corner would help.

Frank
My photo gallery: http://www.frankalvaro.net
>>>> Nikon D300...Nikon 18-200 VR...Sigma 10-20...Tamron 90mm macro <<<<
"I've got an idea--an idea so smart that my head would explode if I even began to know what I'm talking about. " Peter Griffin
User avatar
Frankenstein
Senior Member
 
Posts: 504
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 12:23 pm
Location: Ruse (Sydney)

Postby marcotrov on Thu Oct 20, 2005 8:49 pm

Yeah, I see! Probably would need a bit of selective dodging to get that full sepia effect and add to the 'seen better days' feel. I think the B&W is better at present.
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques