Identify- Flower type please

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Identify- Flower type please

Postby Nikon boy on Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:14 pm

Image
Took this at Tesselars tulip festival about a week ago, can someone tell me what type of flower this is,
Taken with D2x and 50mm 1.8 @ F11 1/45 sec , w/b auto, natural light,
jpeg/fine.
Nikon boy Norman
User avatar
Nikon boy
Member
 
Posts: 368
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:51 pm
Location: California Gully

Postby marcotrov on Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:23 pm

I really don't know what the flower is perhaps a member of the hibiscus family - the lesser known Hibiscus Chernobylus (only found 200m from the Chernobyl implode). But, nikon boy a lovely crisply rendered image of vibrant colour. I just must have a D2X or the D200 if it's the progeny of the D2X. I have LUST big time.
Lovely shot!
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby birddog114 on Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:25 pm

marcotrov wrote:I really don't know what the flower is perhaps a member of the hibiscus family - the lesser known Hibiscus Chernobylus(only found 200m from the Chernobyl implode). But, nikon boy a lovely crisp, nay, razor sharp image of vibrant colour. I just must have a D2X or the D200 if it's the progeny of the D2X. Lovely shot!
cheers
marco


Marco,
The D200 does not produced sharp colour like this one! :lol:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby cameraguy21773 on Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:33 pm

The leaves are a puzzle cuz I'm not an expert, by any means, but they look very much like a cluster I took at a botanical garden that were labeled as orchids. Actually I didn't take 'em :? I took 'em ... knowwhatimean :?:
regards
Mike Parker
Frederick, MD

Take Only Pictures, Leave Only Footprints
User avatar
cameraguy21773
Member
 
Posts: 214
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 10:16 am
Location: Frederick, Maryland USA - D2H, D1x (2), D70

Postby kinetic on Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:43 pm

Ok, I'm no horticulturalist, but I think what you have here is a member of the Rhododendron species (possibly the 'Ben Moseley' hybrid??? :? ). It's pretty similar to an Azalea (in fact it might actually be an Azalea....I think all Azalea's are Rhododendrons, but a Rhododendron isn't always an Azalea. Owwww, I have a headache)! :D
Last edited by kinetic on Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
kinetic
Member
 
Posts: 234
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 11:17 am
Location: North Ipswich

Postby Nikon boy on Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:51 pm

Kinetic, thanks for the response, anyone else out there have any clue ???
Nikon boy Norman
User avatar
Nikon boy
Member
 
Posts: 368
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:51 pm
Location: California Gully

Postby kinetic on Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:53 pm

just edited above post......

Here is a link to a Rhododendron site......

http://www.rhododendron.org/descriptionH_new.asp?ID=956
kinetic
Member
 
Posts: 234
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 11:17 am
Location: North Ipswich

Postby Nikon boy on Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:02 pm

Bingo ! thanks Kinetic , well done
Nikon boy Norman
User avatar
Nikon boy
Member
 
Posts: 368
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:51 pm
Location: California Gully

Postby NJ on Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:12 pm

Is this the same, if so yes it is a Rhododendron. I have this next to my house.
Image
Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800
http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
User avatar
NJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 712
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Ringwood, Melbourne

Postby Nikon boy on Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:26 pm

yep that's it NJ thanks !!
Nikon boy Norman
User avatar
Nikon boy
Member
 
Posts: 368
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:51 pm
Location: California Gully

Postby Killakoala on Wed Oct 19, 2005 8:00 pm

I have one in my garden too. I always called it an Azalea but i could be wrong.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques