iso 640 (not 800) 1/13 F2.8

Image using my new VRModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Image using my new VRHe is a image my assistant captured on Saturday using the 2nd hand VR.
iso 640 (not 800) 1/13 F2.8 ![]()
Hi Vince,
This shot is spectacularly sharp, however I think the heads in the foreground very much distract from the shot. Maybe a tight crop would improve it? It will either improve it or destory it. I hope you don't mind but I made the crop as I saw fit. What do you think? ![]() Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Hi Geoff,
I thought about it...but I have not decided as yet...will do if I use the image in the album. It does look better without the complete arm...but I do like the view of their complete arms..... It was hard...the church had no center aisle ![]() Last edited by shutterbug on Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
That would make things quite challenging Vince...glad u like the 70-200VR tho ![]() Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
shutterbug
It should be nice if you can get the hold head otherwise just keep it aside for your reference not in the album. Yes, the 70-200 is only useful when you play it with roomy in the church or outdoor and always good if you can shoot it in distance not to distract the people, as candid shoot. Otherwise your 17-55Dx will paly a major role in this type of photography. Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
Hi Briddog...you mean the head of the Priest? We got some with his head visable too. These were taken at 200mm
Yes, it should be nice if the photos has his full present, this make an unforgettable memory for the couple in the ir wedding photo album. Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|