What is the image? Which lens took which image?


cheers
marco
Guess what and guess what lens?Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Guess what and guess what lens?I was just about to go to bed but i couldn't resist. Thought I'd share my experimentation with macro this weekend with 2 of my lenses. The AI-S Micro Nikkor 55 F/2.8 and my Nikon 35-70 F2.8 on macro setting.
What is the image? Which lens took which image? ![]() ![]() cheers marco
Marco
I'd say it's a prickly pear. The first one is the 55 and the second the 35-70. The first shot is way sharper, hence my feeling on the 55 (of course you could get closer with the 35-70 ![]() Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Prickly subject.Hi
I would say that the first one is by the 55mm and the second one with 35-70. I think that the 35-70 only has macro at the 35mm end. 35-70 2.8 NON ED and NON D lens ? It is a Cho Cho. Cheers Albert
thanks for contributing guys. It is indeed a cactus leaf. I perhaps should have tweaked the colour on the second to the same as #1 to even them up but the sharpness would not change. It could be argued that my technique was better in the first or I was just lucky.
Actually the first is the 35-70 F2.8 set on macro mode(cropped in though!) and the second is the 55 micro. It surprised me too but i suspect that the difficulty of getting the right focus etc with the 55 as it is all manual on the D70 has something to do with it, because it is a very sharp lens. I will still persevere with it to find a shooting work flow that produces more consistent results. However no question as to the sharpness of the 35-70. This is the reason why I chose it to do the jewelry pamphlet job a few months ago. cheers marco
Hi Marco
Very interesting and good shots anyway. Is the lens the non ED and non D lens? I have one for the last 16 years, it is AF but the macro setting is at 35mm end and goes to manual focus. I have neve used it for macro but will try. There are 2 of these lens on ebay at the moment with low bids on. Cheers Albert
I'd venture to suggest that the more diffuse illumination in the second shot has a not inconsiderable impact upon the perception of acutance also.
Cheers, _______________
Walter "Photography was not a bastard left by science on the doorstep of art, but a legitimate child of the Western pictorial tradition." - Galassi
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|