Guess what and guess what lens?

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Guess what and guess what lens?

Postby marcotrov on Sun Oct 16, 2005 10:33 pm

I was just about to go to bed but i couldn't resist. Thought I'd share my experimentation with macro this weekend with 2 of my lenses. The AI-S Micro Nikkor 55 F/2.8 and my Nikon 35-70 F2.8 on macro setting.
What is the image? Which lens took which image?

Image
Image

cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby stubbsy on Sun Oct 16, 2005 10:51 pm

Marco

I'd say it's a prickly pear. The first one is the 55 and the second the 35-70. The first shot is way sharper, hence my feeling on the 55 (of course you could get closer with the 35-70 :? )
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Flyer on Sun Oct 16, 2005 10:53 pm

Prickly-pear cactus? :?
First one 55mm, second 35-70.

Cheers.
User avatar
Flyer
Member
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:38 pm
Location: Newcastle,NSW Nikon D200

Prickly subject.

Postby Digidegs on Sun Oct 16, 2005 11:35 pm

Hi
I would say that the first one is by the 55mm
and the second one with 35-70. I think that the 35-70 only has macro at the 35mm end. 35-70 2.8 NON ED and NON D lens ?

It is a Cho Cho.

Cheers Albert
User avatar
Digidegs
Member
 
Posts: 84
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 4:42 pm
Location: Perth

Postby Digidegs on Sun Oct 16, 2005 11:54 pm

Now I get it !!!!
Its thewater lilly leaves done with your 80-400 vrrrrrrrrrrrr ?
Not so?

Cheers Albert
User avatar
Digidegs
Member
 
Posts: 84
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 4:42 pm
Location: Perth

Postby marcotrov on Mon Oct 17, 2005 7:30 am

thanks for contributing guys. It is indeed a cactus leaf. I perhaps should have tweaked the colour on the second to the same as #1 to even them up but the sharpness would not change. It could be argued that my technique was better in the first or I was just lucky.
Actually the first is the 35-70 F2.8 set on macro mode(cropped in though!) and the second is the 55 micro. It surprised me too but i suspect that the difficulty of getting the right focus etc with the 55 as it is all manual on the D70 has something to do with it, because it is a very sharp lens. I will still persevere with it to find a shooting work flow that produces more consistent results. However no question as to the sharpness of the 35-70. This is the reason why I chose it to do the jewelry pamphlet job a few months ago.
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby Digidegs on Mon Oct 17, 2005 12:26 pm

Hi Marco
Very interesting and good shots anyway.
Is the lens the non ED and non D lens?
I have one for the last 16 years, it is AF but the macro setting is at 35mm end and goes to manual focus. I have neve used it for macro but will try.

There are 2 of these lens on ebay at the moment with low bids on.

Cheers
Albert
User avatar
Digidegs
Member
 
Posts: 84
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 4:42 pm
Location: Perth

Postby marcotrov on Mon Oct 17, 2005 7:57 pm

Thanks Albert. Its the AF 35-70 F/2.8 D series. Yeah your right the macro switch activates on the 35mm end. It's a lovely lens though a bit prone to lens flare.
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby Sheetshooter on Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:28 pm

I'd venture to suggest that the more diffuse illumination in the second shot has a not inconsiderable impact upon the perception of acutance also.

Cheers,
_______________

Walter

"Photography was not a bastard left by science on the doorstep of art, but a legitimate child of the Western pictorial tradition." - Galassi
Sheetshooter
Senior Member
 
Posts: 891
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 8:29 pm
Location: Lushly Latino Leichhardt

Postby marcotrov on Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:27 pm

Truly spoken Sheetshooter
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques