Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by MHD on Sun Oct 16, 2005 3:30 pm
Well I took a nice little portrait with the sigma 70-200 + SB-80DX + LSII
Here is the original with adjusted curves:
Now I duplicated the layer did a guassian blur and played with levels on the layer a bit so the "glow bits" are higher key that the BG layer... So we call this one Diffuse Glow:
Now the final one I de-saturated and beefed up the contrast using curves even further, so we call this diffuse glow B&W
SO... what do you think? What is your favourite?? Any suggestions for other things to try ? 
-

MHD
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 5829
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
- Location: Chicago Burbs
-
by MHD on Sun Oct 16, 2005 5:28 pm
so most like the original (but are to lazy to make comments)
-

MHD
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 5829
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
- Location: Chicago Burbs
-
by Marvin on Sun Oct 16, 2005 5:37 pm
I prefer the original. To me, the colouring on the second one makes the baby look a bit ill. I find the black and white one a bit too light in some areas and it doesn't look as sharp as the first one (I know, it's supposed to be diffused!).
Nikon D7000
-

Marvin
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1486
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Back in the hot Riverland, SA.
by kipper on Sun Oct 16, 2005 7:28 pm
#1 is the best.
#2 the reds and yellows look wrong....check the skin tones and the lip color. Plus looks a tad soft.
#3 just doesn't work as a BW imho.
Darryl (aka Kipper) Nikon D200
-
kipper
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3738
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
- Location: Hampshire, UK
by Raskill on Sun Oct 16, 2005 10:09 pm
I like the first one better and agree that the tone in the second image makes bub look kinda sick.
I like the B&W one also. But I'm a bit of a sucker for B&W images, I think they always have a classic look to them. But maybe that 's just me!
2x D700, 2x D2h, lenses, speedlights, studio, pelican cases, tripods, monopods, patridges, pear trees etc etc http://www.awbphotos.com.au
-

Raskill
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2161
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:26 pm
- Location: Rockley, near Bathurst, Home of Aussie Motorsport!
-
by Marvin on Mon Oct 17, 2005 7:06 pm
Have you tried the Photoshop 55mm diffuser? I like the results I get with that.
Nikon D7000
-

Marvin
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1486
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Back in the hot Riverland, SA.
by Muzza22au on Mon Oct 17, 2005 7:12 pm
Definately rather the original!
Nikon D80, Nikkor VR 80-400mm, Nikkor 18-135mm (kit lense), 90mm 2.8 macro, Tamron 2x AF TC My Photos
-
Muzza22au
- Member
-
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:01 pm
- Location: Landsdale, Perth, Western Australia 6065
by kinetic on Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:16 pm
IMHO Original is best.
#2 makes baby look anaemic.
#3 is OK but the B&W doesn't add anything to the pic I think.

-
kinetic
- Member
-
- Posts: 234
- Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 11:17 am
- Location: North Ipswich
by MHD on Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:20 pm
righto  thanks all for your opinons!
Back to the PP drawing board!
-

MHD
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 5829
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
- Location: Chicago Burbs
-
by christiand on Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:51 pm
Hi MHD,
No 1 is the best.
No 2 is too soft.
No 3 is like No 2, perhaps try a B/W on No 1 ?
Cheers,
CD
-

christiand
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
- Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra
by Geoff on Mon Oct 17, 2005 10:21 pm
Scotty - no.1 is by far and away the best one, it's natural, the most natural looking. No.2 is ok, but too blurred and no.3 well, it's not no.1  . The first one is the real winner matey. Nice candid.
-

Geoff
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 7791
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
- Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.
-
by Catcha on Tue Oct 18, 2005 12:10 am
Original is the best 
Ben Yu D300,SB800,Sigma 10-20,Mini Trekker Classic,Nova 3,Ixus 55 Other toys coming very soon..stayed tuned !!!!Check out my site http://byu88.smugmug.com<>http://photobucket.com/byu88
-

Catcha
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 787
- Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 2:36 am
- Location: Darwin, Northern Territory Was the only true open speed limts in Australia
by mudder on Tue Oct 18, 2005 7:53 am
Definately the original, maybe the second might work if the eyes etc are still sharp? not sure about the B&W, doesn't seem to "work" for me...
Aka Andrew
-

mudder
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3020
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Burwood East
-
by Yedrup on Tue Oct 18, 2005 10:11 am
Gotta be No 1. 
"Photography is not about cameras, gadgets and gismos. Photography is about photographers. A camera didn't make a great picture any more than a typewriter wrote a great novel." -Peter Adams, Sydney 1978
-

Yedrup
- Member
-
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 2:00 pm
- Location: Narwee
by ozimax on Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:55 pm
#1
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse) Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
-

ozimax
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5289
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
- Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW
by ozimax on Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:56 pm
#1 for me
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse) Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
-

ozimax
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5289
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
- Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|