Moon Pic - Link Fixed

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Moon Pic - Link Fixed

Postby NewbieD70 on Wed Oct 19, 2005 1:06 pm

Well recently with the clear sky over Perth, I tried taking my first moon pic with a lens recently purchased, Nikkor ED 28-200 F3.5 - 5.6.

The data as shot was F10 - 1/250 sec Spot Metering and set to Manual
Not the best moon shot around, but thought i`d post anyway :D

http://photobucket.com/albums/b263/Trev ... =Moon3.jpg
Thanks, Trevor
User avatar
NewbieD70
Member
 
Posts: 88
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 7:57 pm
Location: Perth

Postby blaize on Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:05 am

Hi Newbie D70,

Here is one I took as well seem fairly similar. I used my 70-300 G Lens.

F5.6 1/500th Sec Aperture Priority 300mm focal length and hand held took me alot of different settings and attempts to get to this though!!!

http://www.pbase.com/mrsoz/image/50966942.jpg
D70 18-70mm Kit Lens, Nikkor70-300mm ED, Nikkor 50mm f1.8, Tamron 70-300MM F/4-5.6 LD MACRO 1:2, Sigma 28-200 1:4~5.6, TC-16A AF Teleconverter, SB-800 Nikon F60 Film Body. :-)
User avatar
blaize
Member
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 12:46 pm
Location: Doubtful Creek, North Coast NSW.

Postby Oneputt on Fri Oct 21, 2005 6:30 am

With respect 200 and 300 mm lenses simply do not have enough reach for this sort of thing, and what you guys have captured is about their limit.

May I suggest that you try early morning rather than late at night as the moon always seems to appear closer. :D
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby blaize on Fri Oct 21, 2005 8:25 am

Thanks for that Oneputt,

The weather here has been overcast for a couple of weeks but maybe next full moon I will try out the early morning shot.
Yes I realise these lenses are very limited for this kind of thing but my lens lust doesn't extend to reality at the moment :?
I have been looking at the 2 x teleconverters........ do they make much of a difference with say the 70-300mm lens?

cheers

Tony
D70 18-70mm Kit Lens, Nikkor70-300mm ED, Nikkor 50mm f1.8, Tamron 70-300MM F/4-5.6 LD MACRO 1:2, Sigma 28-200 1:4~5.6, TC-16A AF Teleconverter, SB-800 Nikon F60 Film Body. :-)
User avatar
blaize
Member
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 12:46 pm
Location: Doubtful Creek, North Coast NSW.

Postby Oneputt on Fri Oct 21, 2005 8:31 am

Tony even when I had a 500mm it still wasn't really enough, and I do not know personally how a TC works with that lens. Someone here will though. :D
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby birddog114 on Fri Oct 21, 2005 8:31 am

blaize wrote:I have been looking at the 2 x teleconverters........ do they make much of a difference with say the 70-300mm lens?


Tony,
Negative! no way you can use or have any TC work on that lens.

Posted here before but once again, I repost it for you:

http://blog.nikonians.org/archives/Niko ... 0Table.pdf
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby blaize on Fri Oct 21, 2005 11:34 am

Thanks once again Birddog, I will have a read!!

cheers

Tony
D70 18-70mm Kit Lens, Nikkor70-300mm ED, Nikkor 50mm f1.8, Tamron 70-300MM F/4-5.6 LD MACRO 1:2, Sigma 28-200 1:4~5.6, TC-16A AF Teleconverter, SB-800 Nikon F60 Film Body. :-)
User avatar
blaize
Member
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 12:46 pm
Location: Doubtful Creek, North Coast NSW.

Postby blinkblink on Fri Oct 21, 2005 2:03 pm

I hate it when people moon on public forums.


:D
User avatar
blinkblink
Member
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 6:55 pm
Location: Romsey, Victoria


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques