

Lights on or lights off?Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
21 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Lights on or lights off?Simple question, which of these two photos is better, the first with the lights off or the second?
![]() ![]() __________
Phillip **Nikon D7000**
#2 looks better to me... Are those really the lights? or is it PP... I noticed that the clowds hadn't moved between the 2 shots...
![]() Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
lights off
less distracting and it makes sense it isn't exactly dark. is this a composite image? it looks very stylish very well done.
Sorry to lead you astray guys, I really wanted to see if the PP on the lights was very obviously fake. I should have known that you would have picked up on the fact that it's the same photo.
I was happy the way the first turned out, but everytime I looked at it I couldn't help feeling that I should have turned the headlights on. So I tried it with PP. __________
Phillip **Nikon D7000**
On I think:
In the first image my eyes are first drawn to the sky and then down to the car In the second my eyes go to the lights and the car first. Both pics look very nice though!! Paul http://www.australiandigitalphotography.com
Living in poverty due to my addiction to NIKON... Is there a clinic that can help me?
Thanks for the replies guys. I'm thinking that it may be worthwhile driving down to the southern highlands again to try and replicate the shot with the real lights on.
__________
Phillip **Nikon D7000**
I prefer off and the gradiated orange doesn't help the tree
![]() The yellow headlights look too much like transformers for me...err cartoon not electrical ![]() Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Phillip.....this shot could be so much better
![]() Seriously I think it has the elements to be a good shot. 1) As already mentioned the graduated sky shouldn't affect the tree so you'll need to do a bit more PP around that 2) Make sure all lights that come on with the light switch are on 3) Make sure all necessarily reflections on the car exhibit the lights being on 4) Can you retake the image as I'd like to see the tall tree to the left of the car not cutting through the car Edit: 5) Can you retake it with a better angle of the road so it shows you where the car is coming from Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
Optimus Prime represent! ![]() In the context of this comparison the lights do look a bit fake, but if you'd shown just the "lights on" pic by itself I'm not sure I'd have picked it. Regardless, the sky just looks bizarre for mine, do you have one with unadulterated sky?
First one would be my pick, nice shot BTW
![]() Ben Yu
D300,SB800,Sigma 10-20,Mini Trekker Classic,Nova 3,Ixus 55 Other toys coming very soon..stayed tuned !!!! Check out my site http://byu88.smugmug.com<>http://photobucket.com/byu88
nice image!
i think it looks like its str8 from a magazine my only complaint is the underexposed area in the front of the car, the orig is not as bad tho.....
I prefer lights on, but I agree with kipper. The shot would be beter without the tree growing out of the car.
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
my 2 cents worth......lights on.
I picked the fake lights straight away, but think they make a statement. (I did find the sky a bit distracting 'though.) I have to say that it is quite interesting to read other peoples take on this one. Thanks.
Previous topic • Next topic
21 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|