
Surfing spotlightModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Surfing spotlightJust trying a new Kenko 2x TC - I found all the shots a bit soft - but this might have been to me shaking a bit when taking them. Will have to use a monopod next time.
![]()
cc@t, please excuse me for being honest, but I don't really like this shot.
As you said it's a bit soft, but being handheld and with a 2xTC fair enough... however I don't think the PP you've done on this works.. I think for starters a slower gradient between colour and B&W may have helped..but I'm not sure.. I guess I'm just a little lost as to what you were trying to achieve... I do apologise if this comes off badly - (I just got some bad news so am not in a good mood,but yeah this doesn't work for me). ![]()
I have obtained some very good handheld shots with a 2x converter but you do have to use shutter priority to maintain a high shutter speed. I would also like to ask if this was shot in jpeg mode as there are a lot of artefacts towards the bottom of the pic.
Keep on keeping on ![]() Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Thanks for the comments guys - it was shot in raw but as I said when i was looking at it, it seemed too soft, so I played around in PS and found an action I had never used that gives you a coloured centre and B & W edges.........guess it didn't work though. The artefacts seem to be from that action tho - they weren't in the original...hmmmmm. The truth might be out there....
cc@t, please don't take my earlier comments to heart, been a crappy day and I was in a bad mood. It never hurts to try new things, it might not have worked this time maybe next time it will.
![]()
Yes, have to agree on the post processing here, not that good, BUT, the image has promise as it looks like he's about to fall from the top of a large swell!
IMHO, a shot doesn't have to be tack sharp to be good, it's more a case of capturing the decisive moment. There has been no swell up here on the north coast for months, I think my camera has been eaten by moths it's seen such little use of late! Keep on with the surf shots. I usually use the following settings for surf shots: Manual mode Spot metering F5.6- F6 1/1000 and up shutter speed Auto WB Keep an eye on ISO for cloud cover/light changes etc. If it's getting late, don't be afraid to bump up the ISO to 400 or more. Cheers, Max President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|