Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Killakoala on Fri Feb 18, 2005 4:21 pm
Three new panoramas i shot on St Valentines day.
The first is at 24mm with the kit lens.
The second is at 50mm with the 50mm 1.8 at F8.
The third is at 50mm with the 50mm 1.8 at F8 and 89b Infra-Red filter, converted to B&W. I've never seen an IR pano before so i though i'd do one. I'm not entirely happy with the result though so i will have to do some more. Perhaps with more trees in them.
My personal preference is the 24mm shot as it tends to distort in a pleasing way. You can tell the difference between the 24mm and 50mm by comparing the difference of distortion. I think 18mm distorts just a little too much with 24 being a nice compromise between the true size image at 50mm and wider angle.
Steve. |D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.comLeeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
-

Killakoala
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5398
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: Southland NZ
-
by JordanP on Fri Feb 18, 2005 4:25 pm
Killa - great images. I must say I prefer the 24mm as well. Great capture - and to go IR with Pano - good thinking. I would love to see a large printed version.
How big were the files before you resized for web display?
Craig
-

JordanP
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1050
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
- Location: Lismore, NSW
-
by kipper on Fri Feb 18, 2005 4:26 pm
Depends on what you're taking a pano of Killa. If you have structural objects such as the docks, and boats in the foreground, then yes 18MM is a bit too short a focal length. However if you use an 18MM and the subject is a fair distance away then to me it doesn't really show much distortion. For instance the (crap) pano of Port solent that I did, didn't really have much in the foreground so there isn't much distortion, neither is the case for North Yorkshore. However if you look at the Fareham Creek pano, the subjects in the foreground look distorted.
-
kipper
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3738
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
- Location: Hampshire, UK
by Killakoala on Fri Feb 18, 2005 5:32 pm
Kipper, i absolutely agree with you and i can tell you that i nearly always do panos at different focal lenghts so i can see which looks best. That photo of the Nth Yorks was really nice BTW.
Craig,
Sizes for the images pre-webbing.
First was 19.421 meg
Sec was 33.795 meg
IR was 15.360 meg after B&W conversion
I would love to print it out but alas my Canon i590 does not do continuous roll paper.
Larger (<500k) images are at
http://killakoala.smugmug.com/gallery/292396
Steve. |D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.comLeeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
-

Killakoala
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5398
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: Southland NZ
-
by boxerboy on Fri Feb 18, 2005 5:33 pm
I love pano's and I agree with you Killa that the 24mm is the pick. Shame about the wall in the foreground, but obviously that's a result of the location the shot was taken from.
Cheers
Peter
my karma just ran over your dogma
-

boxerboy
- Member
-
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 10:33 am
- Location: Jimboomba QLD
by birddog114 on Fri Feb 18, 2005 5:36 pm
boxerboy wrote:I love pano's and I agree with you Killa that the 24mm is the pick. Shame about the wall in the foreground, but obviously that's a result of the location the shot was taken from.
Cheers Peter
Yes, I agreed, if you have the 24/f2.8, it'll be excellent on pano, light, prime, and it's a pano lens.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-

birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
by Killakoala on Fri Feb 18, 2005 5:42 pm
boxerboy wrote:I love pano's and I agree with you Killa that the 24mm is the pick. Shame about the wall in the foreground, but obviously that's a result of the location the shot was taken from.
Cheers Peter
I intend to do another one without the wall there. Problem was that the best vantage point to get the bridge, the opera house and the Oriana was where i took that photo from. If i move a bit further to the left there is no wall but on the day the bridge was obscured by the boat. I would like a few clouds in the sky too. I am very tempted to try this at sunset and after dark, but i might need a bodyguard as it's a bit dodgy up there at night especially with 1000's of dollars worth of really cool gear.
Steve. |D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.comLeeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
-

Killakoala
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5398
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: Southland NZ
-
by Killakoala on Fri Feb 18, 2005 5:43 pm
Birddog114 wrote: Yes, I agreed, if you have the 24/f2.8, it'll be excellent on pano, light, prime, and it's a pano lens.
Yep, i couldn't agree more. I am starting to get Prime Lens lust. 
Steve. |D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.comLeeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
-

Killakoala
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5398
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: Southland NZ
-
by birddog114 on Fri Feb 18, 2005 5:50 pm
Killakoala wrote:Birddog114 wrote: Yes, I agreed, if you have the 24/f2.8, it'll be excellent on pano, light, prime, and it's a pano lens.
Yep, i couldn't agree more. I am starting to get Prime Lens lust. 
Next time, I'll loan you an "old" Nikon AF-D 20-35/2.8
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-

birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
by sirhc55 on Fri Feb 18, 2005 6:47 pm
Really nice panos Killa but I would tend to describe the distortion as perspective with vanishing point 
Chris -------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
-

sirhc55
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
by Glen on Fri Feb 18, 2005 6:55 pm
Killa, great. It is good to see someone using that extended walkway and lift. I think the 24mm works well here too. I have a manual 28mm 2.8 which you are free to borrow if you like or Birddys. You wont need a bodyguard with my manual lens 
-

Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by Killakoala on Fri Feb 18, 2005 9:36 pm
Glen said ......and lift...
There's a lift ????
Thanks for the offer of the borrow of the lens fellows. I may or may not take you up on the offer. I will see how i feel on the day, i do act spontaneously so might not be able to 'plan' it.
Steve. |D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.comLeeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
-

Killakoala
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5398
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: Southland NZ
-
by bochup on Sat Feb 19, 2005 12:31 am
Nice pano Killa. Shame about the wall but my eye still gets drawn into the picture.
I'm guessing you took this from Circular Quay station platform 2 rather than the extended walkway Glen is referring to on the Cahill Expressway?
The lift for the extended walkway is further down behind the Arc coffee shop at the end of the wharves to the right of the pano. It's higher up than the station and doesn't have a stone wall IIRC.
It's been a while since I worked at the quay so correct me if I'm wrong.
-
bochup
- Newbie
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 2:19 pm
- Location: Penshurst - Sydney (the place to be)
by below-0 on Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:50 am
Very nice Panorama of a location that well deserves one - Cahill exp, on CQuay is a great location for urban harbour shots, which is why I'd pick the first shot 24m kit lense as there's more movement of this fact visible + the complete building aignment is a nice touch off the border.
I took a similair subject a few nights ago as there's been some big ships over the holidays in the harbour, and must say taking an exposure foto at night on the expressway can be tricky as trains and car traffic move the whole structure a fair amount.
-
below-0
- Member
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:27 pm
by mudder on Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:12 pm
Great pano's and it's interesting to see the differences between the 24mm and 50mm lengths... Like the 24mm pano out of these...
Looking forward to seeing the results of your next one at sunset... Im a sucker for a good pano and these are terrific.
Aka Andrew
-

mudder
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3020
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Burwood East
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|