


what do think?
Edit: just bumped up the contrast of the first pic, looked a little washed out before hand.
flight centerModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
flight centerWent to the local jumps this arfternoon to get some pics of my mates in the air. these are a couple that i came away with.
![]() ![]() ![]() what do think? Edit: just bumped up the contrast of the first pic, looked a little washed out before hand. Last edited by NJ on Sun Oct 16, 2005 7:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800 http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
First one is great, love the dust trail, but he gets a bit lost in the trees. Maybe some fill flash to bring him out more? For the second one, the underexposure isn't quite enough to be a silhouette; IMO you need to go one way or the other on this one, have the rider properly exposed (probably needs fill flash) or have the rider totally underexposed for a silhouette effect. Ooh there's a 3rd one now! Same critique as the second, but I like the panning!
Hope this helps. ![]()
Thanks for the tips. I currently dont have a nice big flash and i dont think that the built in flash will have produced enough fill to make a difference. I really need to get my hands on a SB-600
![]() ![]() Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800 http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
Previous topic • Next topic
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|