12-24 mm, 1/1.3 sec, F9

24-120 VR, 2 sec, F5.6

and finally, a postcard shot!
12-24mm, 3 sec, F4

Sydney skylineModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Sydney skylineA few pics from the night shoot at the weekend. Never done one of these before. It was fun but waaaay too windy. If you want to see a larger version, click a pic. Enjoy.
12-24 mm, 1/1.3 sec, F9 ![]() 24-120 VR, 2 sec, F5.6 ![]() and finally, a postcard shot! 12-24mm, 3 sec, F4 ![]() Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Impressive detail on that bridge shot Peter!
To me, the skyline shot has a little too much sky - not sure. You gotta love that blue on the water though eh! *** When getting there is half the fun! ***
Peter,
I love the composition and the black/white contrast of no. 2; no. 3 is pretty, but I think it's missing a real point of interest. Frank My photo gallery: http://www.frankalvaro.net
>>>> Nikon D300...Nikon 18-200 VR...Sigma 10-20...Tamron 90mm macro <<<< "I've got an idea--an idea so smart that my head would explode if I even began to know what I'm talking about. " Peter Griffin
Great shots Peter, I'd say my order of preference is 1, 2, 3.
The first I really like the menacing tower, and you caught the moon too. #2 I like this one, stark bones in the black of night #3 While I like something, I think there is too much blue.. that or the water is just a little too rough... (I still wish I too it ![]()
Thanks one and all for your comments
Craig - I like #1 the best too. I like the dramatic off centre tower and the way it's balanced by that tiny sliver of moon and a star Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Too windy for your Gitzo????
Nice pics Peter. I like the tower pic best but the bridge holds some interesting interest and appealing appeal too. Last edited by Killakoala on Sat Oct 15, 2005 6:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|