Lights on or lights off?

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Lights on or lights off?

Postby phillipb on Thu Oct 13, 2005 9:11 pm

Simple question, which of these two photos is better, the first with the lights off or the second?

Image

Image
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby leek on Thu Oct 13, 2005 9:19 pm

#2 looks better to me... Are those really the lights? or is it PP... I noticed that the clowds hadn't moved between the 2 shots... :-)
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby wendellt on Thu Oct 13, 2005 9:20 pm

lights off
less distracting and it makes sense it isn't exactly dark.

is this a composite image? it looks very stylish very well done.
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby sheepie on Thu Oct 13, 2005 9:21 pm

on - great pic!
*** When getting there is half the fun! ***
User avatar
sheepie
Key Member
 
Posts: 3029
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:56 am
Location: Picnic Point, Sydney Australia *** Nikon D200/D70 ***

Postby phillipb on Thu Oct 13, 2005 9:26 pm

Sorry to lead you astray guys, I really wanted to see if the PP on the lights was very obviously fake. I should have known that you would have picked up on the fact that it's the same photo.
I was happy the way the first turned out, but everytime I looked at it I couldn't help feeling that I should have turned the headlights on. So I tried it with PP.
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby NikonUser on Thu Oct 13, 2005 9:38 pm

On I think:

In the first image my eyes are first drawn to the sky and then down to the car

In the second my eyes go to the lights and the car first.

Both pics look very nice though!!

Paul
http://www.australiandigitalphotography.com

Living in poverty due to my addiction to NIKON... Is there a clinic that can help me?
User avatar
NikonUser
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 6:18 pm
Location: Canberra - **D2X**

Postby Matt. K on Thu Oct 13, 2005 9:40 pm

Off...or on. Maybe the little lights down near the bumper might be better on?
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby TonyH on Thu Oct 13, 2005 9:41 pm

I believe the lights on reflects more the overall lightness of the shot......
All I know, is that I don't know enough.....
TonyH
Senior Member
 
Posts: 856
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:39 am
Location: Brisbane, QLD Nikon D200 & D70

Postby nito on Thu Oct 13, 2005 10:11 pm

lights on adds cats eyes to the car. Much better for the mood of the shot.

Nice car btw. :D
nito
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1109
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 11:24 am
Location: Gladesville, NSW

Postby phillipb on Thu Oct 13, 2005 10:21 pm

Thanks for the replies guys. I'm thinking that it may be worthwhile driving down to the southern highlands again to try and replicate the shot with the real lights on.
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby PiroStitch on Thu Oct 13, 2005 11:10 pm

I prefer off and the gradiated orange doesn't help the tree :) Maybe try multiply or overlay for the gradient layer.

The yellow headlights look too much like transformers for me...err cartoon not electrical :P
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby kipper on Thu Oct 13, 2005 11:35 pm

Phillip.....this shot could be so much better :)

Seriously I think it has the elements to be a good shot.

1) As already mentioned the graduated sky shouldn't affect the tree so you'll need to do a bit more PP around that

2) Make sure all lights that come on with the light switch are on

3) Make sure all necessarily reflections on the car exhibit the lights being on

4) Can you retake the image as I'd like to see the tall tree to the left of the car not cutting through the car

Edit:

5) Can you retake it with a better angle of the road so it shows you where the car is coming from
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby MCWB on Fri Oct 14, 2005 12:04 am

PiroStitch wrote:The yellow headlights look too much like transformers for me...err cartoon not electrical :P

Optimus Prime represent! :lol:

In the context of this comparison the lights do look a bit fake, but if you'd shown just the "lights on" pic by itself I'm not sure I'd have picked it. Regardless, the sky just looks bizarre for mine, do you have one with unadulterated sky?
User avatar
MCWB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2121
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70

Postby phillipb on Fri Oct 14, 2005 12:16 am

Here is the original, complete with humangus dust bunny. :D

Image
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby MCWB on Fri Oct 14, 2005 12:43 am

Have to say, I actually quite like the sky in the original Phillip! :) Maybe just some more saturation in the blue colour and the sky's a winner IMO (apart from the DB of course).
User avatar
MCWB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2121
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70

Postby Catcha on Fri Oct 14, 2005 12:54 am

First one would be my pick, nice shot BTW :D
Ben Yu

D300,SB800,Sigma 10-20,Mini Trekker Classic,Nova 3,Ixus 55 Other toys coming very soon..stayed tuned !!!!

Check out my site http://byu88.smugmug.com<>http://photobucket.com/byu88
User avatar
Catcha
Senior Member
 
Posts: 787
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 2:36 am
Location: Darwin, Northern Territory Was the only true open speed limts in Australia

Postby flipfrog on Fri Oct 14, 2005 5:14 am

nice image!
i think it looks like its str8 from a magazine

my only complaint is the underexposed area in the front of the car, the orig is not as bad tho.....
User avatar
flipfrog
Senior Member
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: Vancouver Canada

Postby the foto fanatic on Fri Oct 14, 2005 7:53 am

I prefer lights on, but I agree with kipper. The shot would be beter without the tree growing out of the car.
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby cordy on Fri Oct 14, 2005 9:10 am

I think lights on too, it draws more attention to the car

Chris
cordy
Member
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 3:04 pm
Location: Canberra - Nikon D70 / Canon 20D

Postby shutterbug on Fri Oct 14, 2005 11:57 am

Lights off for me. Love the background colour and trees.

Its more fun in the dark :wink:
User avatar
shutterbug
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:32 am
Location: A Pub in Sydney / Bankstown

Postby nat on Fri Oct 14, 2005 1:18 pm

my 2 cents worth......lights on.

I picked the fake lights straight away, but think they make a statement. (I did find the sky a bit distracting 'though.)

I have to say that it is quite interesting to read other peoples take on this one. Thanks.
User avatar
nat
Member
 
Posts: 161
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:07 pm
Location: Gawler, South Australia


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques